{ "schema_version": "chamgap-public-evidence-check-1.0", "public_id": "v2945-s0", "verdict_number": "2945", "title": "0.25 Hz rocking bed × One-night N3 proportion evidence checklist", "view_version": "1.0", "view_created_date": "2026-10-11", "criteria_version": "1.0", "criteria_date": "2026-10-06", "review_date": null, "legacy_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "review_scope": { "materials_read": "Existing review summaries and stored records of methodological application", "clinical_papers_directly_read": false, "new_clinical_search": false, "limitation": "The designated complete stored summary and selected subclaim were read for production. External abstracts, full texts, registrations, protocols, and SAPs remain unread; access was not attempted. Only methodological records, the status dictionary, and data structure were reused from earlier cases. The original content review remains incomplete; separate link, screen, and content reviews and clinical searches were not performed at the time.", "date_meaning": "This is the date the stored materials were checked, not the date of a new search of the clinical literature." }, "claim_context": { "population": "18 healthy young adults; exact ages, composition, and baseline conditions unverified", "intervention": "Original research exposure to lateral bed rocking at 0.25 Hz", "dose": "One night per condition at the original 0.25 Hz; amplitude and actual exposure details unverified. No device-use or behavioral instructions.", "comparator": "Stationary bed; randomized counterbalanced crossover; specific environmental and noise conditions unverified", "endpoint": "Surrogate outcome: polysomnographic proportion of total sleep spent in N3 (%)", "duration": "One night per condition; interval, adaptation, and continued or long-term use unverified", "excluded_extensions": [ "Converting N3 proportion into clinically restful sleep or improvement in insomnia", "Inventing total-sleep or memory effects from the title or fraction", "Other frequencies, devices, populations, or optimal settings", "Sustained, long-term, or post-cessation effects and overall safety", "Instructions for device use, sleep treatment, or insomnia treatment" ] }, "requirements": [ { "item_id": "N01", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Is the selected question an increase in the proportion of N3 sleep over one night?", "needed": "Connection between the subclaim, parent population and intervention, N3, and duration", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Is the selected question an increase in the proportion of N3 sleep over one night?", "application_exception": "Do not create a new verdict or split, or fill the sibling insomnia question with the same effect.", "criterion": "Distinguish the exact question from the verdict record.", "basis": "M03 §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.4 question-clarification principles; detailed separation rules are our own design / M03 §3.2.4; our own extension boundary", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If the question actually changes, record the original question and excluded scope separately.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The selected original question is an increase in the proportion of N3 sleep over one night. It is preserved as a question about a measured sleep outcome comparing a bed rocking laterally at 0.25 Hz with a stationary bed.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Original preserved-summary statements were linked for production as partly verified; clinical verification and content review are not complete. The final count of independent claims remains undetermined.", "missingness": "The final count of independent claims remains undetermined.", "uncertainty": "Do not create a new verdict or split, or fill the sibling insomnia question with the same effect. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Connection between the subclaim, parent population and intervention, N3, and duration" }, { "item_id": "N02", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Are the subclaim's grade C and note separate from the parent's C54 and axes?", "needed": "Actual subclaim fields and their absence, and the location of original parent values", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are the subclaim's grade C and note separate from the parent's C54 and axes?", "application_exception": "Do not copy the parent's score of 54 or S/R1/I2/E+/B2 into subclaim-specific values.", "criterion": "Retain the actual scope of subclaim and parent values.", "basis": "M03 §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.4 question-clarification principles; detailed separation rules are our own design / M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; current material-conversion limits reflect review scope and our own design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If subclaim fields are actually added, separate the original version from the new event.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Preserve the selected subclaim's grade C and note: 27.41% versus 22.37%, adjusted P=0.0006. The subclaim has no score, status, or axis keys; these remain null. The parent's C54, Unknown safety, and axes are parent history.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Original preserved-summary statements were linked for production as partly verified; clinical verification and content review are not complete. The original materials contain no distinct subclaim score, status or axes.", "missingness": "The original materials contain no distinct subclaim score, status or axes.", "uncertainty": "Do not copy the parent's score of 54 or S/R1/I2/E+/B2 into subclaim-specific values. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Actual subclaim fields and their absence, and the location of original parent values" }, { "item_id": "N03", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Do historical verdicts, design limitations, and cross-checks constitute a current review?", "needed": "Korean and English verdicts, assessment axes, existing synthesis, review date, and correction history", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Do historical verdicts, design limitations, and cross-checks constitute a current review?", "application_exception": "Do not inherit historical cross-checks or grades as a review passed in this work or an independent subclaim verdict.", "criterion": "Preserve the original history while marking the original content review as incomplete.", "basis": "M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; current material-conversion limits reflect review scope and our own design / M08 §8.1–8.2.3; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If new evidence is requested, separate the original version from an evidence-update event.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The parent describes C54 in the context of a small study of 18 people, one night per condition, and a measured surrogate outcome, and records incorporation of cross-checks. Null, false, and empty-string axis values are also historical records.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. No current RoB2, GRADE, methodological certification, or clinical reassessment has been performed.", "missingness": "No current RoB2, GRADE, methodological certification, or clinical reassessment has been performed.", "uncertainty": "Do not inherit historical cross-checks or grades as a review passed in this work or an independent subclaim verdict. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Korean and English verdicts, assessment axes, existing synthesis, review date, and correction history" }, { "item_id": "N04", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Which materials were actually read, and which external materials remain unread?", "needed": "Acquisition, reading, and locations for the stored summary and each external material", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This condition is needed to record original information and gaps separately for the question: Which materials were actually read, and which external materials remain unread?", "application_exception": "Do not label an existing URL or a historical reference to original text as current full-text reading or failed access.", "criterion": "Distinguish reading the local summary from unread external materials, by material.", "basis": "M04 §4.5–4.6 material-collection and selection principles; separation of access and reading and hyperlink rules are our own design / M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; current material-conversion limits reflect review scope and our own design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If materials or reading records are added, record only the actual material level.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The designated complete stored JSON summary and selected subclaim were read for production. External abstracts, full texts, registrations, plans, and links have not been read, and access has not been attempted.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Partial verification links the original narrative in the stored summary for production; it does not constitute clinical verification or completed content review. External originals have not been read, and no current comprehensive literature search has been performed.", "missingness": "External originals have not been read, and no current comprehensive literature search has been performed.", "uncertainty": "Do not label an existing URL or a historical reference to original text as current full-text reading or failed access. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Acquisition, reading, and locations for the stored summary and each external material" }, { "item_id": "N05", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "How are reports, registrations, and study families connected?", "needed": "Original bibliography, registration and trial identity, and related reports", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: How are reports, registrations, and study families connected?", "application_exception": "Do not turn Not confirmed into Not applicable, a registration number, or zero trials.", "criterion": "Preserve the original report and registration identifier, leaving undetermined unique counts null.", "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 on distinguishing studies from reports; cohort and outcome connections are Chamgap adaptations / M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap adaptation / M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap adaptation", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If an original related-report list is provided, record same-family, recitation, and different-family relationships.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Connect the preserved bibliography for Perrault et al., Curr Biol 2019;29:402-411.e3, PMID 30686735, with one evidence entry. The original registration identifier value is Not confirmed.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. DOI, PMCID, actual registration, and the number of unique trials are unverified.", "missingness": "DOI, PMCID, actual registration, and the number of unique trials are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not turn Not confirmed into Not applicable, a registration number, or zero trials. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original bibliography, registration and trial identity, and related reports" }, { "item_id": "N06", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Was the actual population healthy young adults?", "needed": "Exact age, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and baseline sleep and vestibular characteristics", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Was the actual population healthy young adults?", "application_exception": "Do not extend healthy young adults to direct effects in insomnia or other age or disease groups.", "criterion": "Retain the original population and unverified selection and applicability scope.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.1; detailed population conditions are our own design / M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; dose, persistence and effect-modification details are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If the original population table is provided, distinguish actual selection criteria from gaps for other populations.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The preserved population is 18 healthy young adults. Retain the original statement that these were not results from testing people with insomnia.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Exact ages, sex composition, and baseline sleep and disease conditions are unverified.", "missingness": "Exact ages, sex composition, and baseline sleep and disease conditions are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not extend healthy young adults to direct effects in insomnia or other age or disease groups. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Exact age, inclusion and exclusion criteria, and baseline sleep and vestibular characteristics" }, { "item_id": "N07", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "What was the rocking-bed exposure in the study?", "needed": "Device version, amplitude and path, actual duration and interruptions, and exposure records", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What was the rocking-bed exposure in the study?", "application_exception": "Do not turn 0.25 Hz into manufacturing, setup, or use instructions, or a recommendation for an optimal frequency.", "criterion": "Preserve only the original lateral movement, frequency, and one-night condition.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; reverse-direction labeling and assessment adaptations are our own design / M03 §3.2.3, M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original device or exposure materials are provided, distinguish nominal conditions from actual use.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original intervention was a bed moving laterally at 0.25 Hz, with one night of research exposure per condition. It is not product-use or sleep-treatment guidance.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Amplitude, device model, and details of actual exposure interruptions and adherence are unverified.", "missingness": "Amplitude, device model, and details of actual exposure interruptions and adherence are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not turn 0.25 Hz into manufacturing, setup, or use instructions, or a recommendation for an optimal frequency. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Device version, amplitude and path, actual duration and interruptions, and exposure records" }, { "item_id": "N08", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Were other environmental conditions the same with the stationary bed?", "needed": "Stationary control, environment and noise, device conditions, and shared exposures", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Were other environmental conditions the same with the stationary bed?", "application_exception": "Do not turn the stationary-bed comparison into an untreated-insomnia trial or a comparison of other devices.", "criterion": "Distinguish the actual comparator from gaps in specific environmental conditions.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; reverse-direction labeling and assessment adaptations are our own design / M03 §3.2.3, M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original comparator materials are provided, record actual shared factors and differences other than movement.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original comparison is a rocking versus stationary bed. The summary does not contain details of shared or differing noise, room conditions, device appearance, or other exposures.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Specific stationary-control conditions and balance of other environmental factors are unverified.", "missingness": "Specific stationary-control conditions and balance of other environmental factors are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not turn the stationary-bed comparison into an untreated-insomnia trial or a comparison of other devices. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Stationary control, environment and noise, device conditions, and shared exposures" }, { "item_id": "N09", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "What were the crossover sequence, counterbalancing, and effects between periods?", "needed": "Allocation and concealment, sequence-specific denominators, period interval, adaptation, and carryover", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What were the crossover sequence, counterbalancing, and effects between periods?", "application_exception": "Do not use the label counterbalanced to declare no carryover or fulfillment of all analysis conditions.", "criterion": "Preserve both the original sequence strength and gaps in crossover details.", "basis": "M08 §8.1–8.2.3; Chamgap adaptation / M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap adaptation / M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; reverse-direction labels and measurement adaptations are Chamgap designs", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If the original crossover plan or analysis is provided, record sequence, period, and carryover assumptions.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original summary describes a randomized counterbalanced crossover, with condition order randomized and counterbalanced.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. The interval, adaptation nights, washout, and handling of period and sequence effects are unverified.", "missingness": "The interval, adaptation nights, washout, and handling of period and sequence effects are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not use the label counterbalanced to declare no carryover or fulfillment of all analysis conditions. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Allocation and concealment, sequence-specific denominators, period interval, adaptation, and carryover" }, { "item_id": "N10", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Are the 18 people and nights per condition repeated observations of the same people?", "needed": "Connections and inclusion flow for people, nights, conditions, and measurements", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are the 18 people and nights per condition repeated observations of the same people?", "application_exception": "Do not sum nights, two conditions, or numbers of scorers into a participant total.", "criterion": "Keep the original 18 people and repeated conditions as different units.", "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 on distinguishing studies from reports; cohort and outcome connections are Chamgap adaptations / M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are Chamgap designs", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original flow or records are provided, distinguish people from inclusion by night and endpoint.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The 18 people slept for one night in each rocking and stationary condition. Do not count the same people's conditions, nights, sleep measurements, or memory results as different participants or independent trials.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Actual analysis denominators for each endpoint, and missing nights or measurements, are unverified.", "missingness": "Actual analysis denominators for each endpoint, and missing nights or measurements, are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not sum nights, two conditions, or numbers of scorers into a participant total. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Connections and inclusion flow for people, nights, conditions, and measurements" }, { "item_id": "N11", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Are recruitment, completion, and the N3 analysis denominator directly verified?", "needed": "Participant and condition flow, valid N3 pairs, exclusions, and missingness", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are recruitment, completion, and the N3 analysis denominator directly verified?", "application_exception": "Do not automatically replicate 18 as a complete analysis denominator for every endpoint and harm.", "criterion": "Distinguish the original study scale from endpoint-specific analysis gaps.", "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are our own design / M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original flow and endpoint analysis tables are provided, record study scale and actual analysis denominators.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The preserved scale is 18 people and one night per condition. The summary contains no detailed flow for recruitment, allocation, completion, N3 analysis and exclusions, or valid paired observations.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Actual valid N3 pairs, attrition, measurement failures, and exclusion rules are unverified.", "missingness": "Actual valid N3 pairs, attrition, measurement failures, and exclusion rules are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not automatically replicate 18 as a complete analysis denominator for every endpoint and harm. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Participant and condition flow, valid N3 pairs, exclusions, and missingness" }, { "item_id": "N12", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "What are the denominator, unit, and measurement for N3?", "needed": "Stage definition, total-sleep denominator, scoring and recording methods, and valid intervals", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What are the denominator, unit, and measurement for N3?", "application_exception": "Do not substitute increased total sleep duration or clinically restful sleep for an increased N3 proportion.", "criterion": "Distinguish the original measured percentage from absolute sleep duration and clinical outcomes.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design / M08 Table 8.2.a, M03 §3.2.4; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If the original measurement methods are provided, record N3 and total-sleep denominators, scales, and analysis windows.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "This is the polysomnographic proportion of total sleep spent in N3; the original proportion unit is %. N3 fraction is a different measure from absolute total sleep duration.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Direct total sleep duration values, detailed sleep-stage criteria, and valid intervals are unverified.", "missingness": "Direct total sleep duration values, detailed sleep-stage criteria, and valid intervals are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not substitute increased total sleep duration or clinically restful sleep for an increased N3 proportion. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Stage definition, total-sleep denominator, scoring and recording methods, and valid intervals" }, { "item_id": "N13", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "To whom did blinding of sleep-stage scoring apply?", "needed": "Scoring criteria, scorer agreement, unblinding, and participant and analyst blinding", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: To whom did blinding of sleep-stage scoring apply?", "application_exception": "Do not extend blinding of two scorers to double blinding or blinding of all procedures.", "criterion": "Distinguish the original scoring strength from role-specific gaps.", "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M03 §3.2.4; our own application / M08 §8.1–8.2.3; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original scoring materials are provided, record role-specific blinding and the scope of scorer agreement.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Preserve the original account that two scorers scored sleep stages without knowing the condition. The summary contains no account of blinding for other roles.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Scorer agreement, participant and other-role blinding, and unblinding are unverified.", "missingness": "Scorer agreement, participant and other-role blinding, and unblinding are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not extend blinding of two scorers to double blinding or blinding of all procedures. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Scoring criteria, scorer agreement, unblinding, and participant and analyst blinding" }, { "item_id": "N14", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "What were the original N3 proportions and the ± and SEM notation?", "needed": "Original summary statistics, definitions of each ±, paired data, and estimated differences", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What were the original N3 proportions and the ± and SEM notation?", "application_exception": "Do not subtract condition means to calculate a new percentage-point difference, SD, or paired CI.", "criterion": "Preserve the original proportions, ± and SEM, and adjusted P at the level of their reported notation.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are our own design / M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are our own design / M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original results or methods are provided, distinguish condition summary statistics from paired-comparison estimates.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Preserve the original notation: rocking 27.41%±1.70(SEM) versus stationary 22.37%±1.65, with Bonferroni-adjusted P=0.0006. SEM is linked to the original notation; it is not an interval for the paired difference.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Paired differences and variance, and details of each summary statistic in the original table, remain unread externally.", "missingness": "Paired differences and variance, and details of each summary statistic in the original table, remain unread externally.", "uncertainty": "Do not subtract condition means to calculate a new percentage-point difference, SD, or paired CI. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original summary statistics, definitions of each ±, paired data, and estimated differences" }, { "item_id": "N15", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "What were the paired effect of interest, model, and period adjustment?", "needed": "Crossover paired model, period and sequence, effect of interest, and variance", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What were the paired effect of interest, model, and period adjustment?", "application_exception": "Do not treat crossover data as two independent parallel groups or create a new effect estimate.", "criterion": "Distinguish the crossover design from gaps in actual analysis details.", "basis": "M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap adaptation / M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; Chamgap adaptation / M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are Chamgap designs", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If the original statistical plan or methods are provided, record condition values and the actual estimand.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original materials contain condition-specific N3 proportions and an adjusted P. The summary lacks details of the paired-difference model, period and sequence adjustment, and effect of interest.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. The paired model, period and sequence adjustment, and correlation structure are unverified.", "missingness": "The paired model, period and sequence adjustment, and correlation structure are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not treat crossover data as two independent parallel groups or create a new effect estimate. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Crossover paired model, period and sequence, effect of interest, and variance" }, { "item_id": "N16", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Are historical non-reporting of a 95% CI and current unread status distinguished?", "needed": "Paired differences, CIs, and reporting scope in the original results", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are historical non-reporting of a 95% CI and current unread status distinguished?", "application_exception": "Do not recalculate a CI from SEM, P, and 18 people, or turn unread status into a current direct verification of non-reporting.", "criterion": "Retain the historical non-reporting account and current gap in directly verified intervals.", "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are Chamgap designs / M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; Chamgap adaptation / M04 §4.5–4.6 on collecting and selecting materials; separating access from reading and hyperlink rules are Chamgap designs", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original tables are provided, record actual intervals and the scope of the historical non-reporting account.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original summary states that a 95% confidence interval was not reported. The original paper tables have not been directly read in this work, so a current full-text comparison is not complete.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. There is no directly verified 95% CI, and the external original tables remain unread.", "missingness": "There is no directly verified 95% CI, and the external original tables remain unread.", "uncertainty": "Do not recalculate a CI from SEM, P, and 18 people, or turn unread status into a current direct verification of non-reporting. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Paired differences, CIs, and reporting scope in the original results" }, { "item_id": "N17", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Is there a threshold for a clinically important increase in N3?", "needed": "Clinical importance of the measured change, direct patient outcomes, and original criteria", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Is there a threshold for a clinically important increase in N3?", "application_exception": "Do not turn the difference between condition proportions into a new MCID or criterion for successful restful sleep.", "criterion": "Preserve both the original absence-of-threshold account and the surrogate-outcome limitation.", "basis": "M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; our own application / M03 §3.2.4; our own boundary on extensions", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If relevant criteria or clinical materials are provided, distinguish the N3 signal from direct clinical importance.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The existing study explanation states that there was no threshold for a clinically important increase in N3. Do not judge the measurement signal as clinically restful sleep or improvement in insomnia.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. A validated clinically important difference or individual-response threshold is currently unverified.", "missingness": "A validated clinically important difference or individual-response threshold is currently unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not turn the difference between condition proportions into a new MCID or criterion for successful restful sleep. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Clinical importance of the measured change, direct patient outcomes, and original criteria" }, { "item_id": "N18", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Which set of tests did the Bonferroni adjustment cover?", "needed": "Test list, adjustment family, prespecified versus exploratory analyses, and multiplicity plan", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Which set of tests did the Bonferroni adjustment cover?", "application_exception": "Do not certify fulfillment of all selective-reporting or multiplicity conditions from the adjusted P alone.", "criterion": "Distinguish the original adjustment notation from planning gaps.", "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap adaptation / M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; Chamgap adaptation", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original plans or methods are provided, record each result and the actual adjustment and hierarchy.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Preserve N3 adjusted P=0.0006 and the original use of Bonferroni adjustment. The summary lacks details of the full test family, prespecification, and alpha allocation.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. The full test and adjustment scope and prespecified analysis plan are unverified.", "missingness": "The full test and adjustment scope and prespecified analysis plan are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not certify fulfillment of all selective-reporting or multiplicity conditions from the adjusted P alone. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Test list, adjustment family, prespecified versus exploratory analyses, and multiplicity plan" }, { "item_id": "N19", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Were a single prespecified primary endpoint and registration directly read?", "needed": "Original registration, protocol and SAP, endpoint hierarchy, and changes", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Were a single prespecified primary endpoint and registration directly read?", "application_exception": "Do not certify N3 in the selected table as a new prespecified primary endpoint or conclude that registration was absent.", "criterion": "Preserve the original hierarchy history and external planning gaps.", "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; our own application / M04 §4.5–4.6 material-collection and selection principles; separation of access and reading and hyperlink rules are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original plans are provided, distinguish prespecified, secondary, and exploratory outcomes and reporting lists.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The existing verdict rationale states that a single prespecified primary endpoint was not named, and the verification wording in the existing citation preserves this account. The registration field is Not confirmed, and registration and plans remain unread in this work.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. N3's prespecified hierarchy, registration timing and content, and plan changes are unverified.", "missingness": "N3's prespecified hierarchy, registration timing and content, and plan changes are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not certify N3 in the selected table as a new prespecified primary endpoint or conclude that registration was absent. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original registration, protocol and SAP, endpoint hierarchy, and changes" }, { "item_id": "N20", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Is the N2 sleep-onset result different from N3?", "needed": "N2 onset definition, denominator, ± and intervals, and analysis hierarchy", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Is the N2 sleep-onset result different from N3?", "application_exception": "Do not copy N3's SEM or values into N2 or extend N2 onset to an insomnia-treatment effect.", "criterion": "Preserve the original onset result, minutes, and adjusted P as a separate outcome.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are our own design / M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; status separation is our own design / M03 §3.2.4; our own extension boundary", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original results or methods are provided, record onset results separately from N3 and other sleep measures.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original N2 onset result is 10.08±1.54 versus 16.72±5.52 minutes, adjusted P=0.006. It is a different outcome and unit from the N3 proportion, and the type of ± is not specified in that account.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Definitions of each N2 ±, paired CI, denominator, and prespecified hierarchy are unverified.", "missingness": "Definitions of each N2 ±, paired CI, denominator, and prespecified hierarchy are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not copy N3's SEM or values into N2 or extend N2 onset to an insomnia-treatment effect. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "N2 onset definition, denominator, ± and intervals, and analysis hierarchy" }, { "item_id": "N21", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Are total sleep duration and other sleep-stage results directly available?", "needed": "Values, denominators, timing, and plans for total sleep, stages, awakenings, and efficiency", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are total sleep duration and other sleep-stage results directly available?", "application_exception": "Do not write that total sleep increased or all sleep measures improved on the basis of an increased N3 proportion.", "criterion": "Leave directly unavailable overall and other sleep values unverified.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are our own design / M03 §3.2.4; our own extension boundary", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original sleep tables are provided, distinguish proportions, absolute duration, and other measures.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original definition of N3 is a proportion of total sleep. This summary contains no quantitative results for total sleep duration, other stage proportions, awakenings, or sleep efficiency.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Total sleep duration and other sleep results and intervals are unverified.", "missingness": "Total sleep duration and other sleep results and intervals are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not write that total sleep increased or all sleep measures improved on the basis of an increased N3 proportion. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Values, denominators, timing, and plans for total sleep, stages, awakenings, and efficiency" }, { "item_id": "N22", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "What information is available about memory and neural oscillation results?", "needed": "Definitions, timing, denominators, quantitative results, and hierarchy for memory and neural measures", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What information is available about memory and neural oscillation results?", "application_exception": "Do not invent memory-improvement effects, statistical significance, or clinical benefit from the title alone.", "criterion": "Preserve the original title while retaining gaps in direct results.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are Chamgap designs / M03 §3.2.4; Chamgap's own extrapolation boundary / M04 §4.5–4.6 on collecting and selecting materials; separating access from reading and hyperlink rules are Chamgap designs", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original materials are provided, distinguish the title from actual results and analyses.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The paper title mentions neural oscillations and benefits for Sleep and Memory. The current stored summary contains no direct results for memory tasks, denominators, effects, CIs, or P values.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Direct quantitative values and prespecified hierarchy for memory and neural oscillations are unverified.", "missingness": "Direct quantitative values and prespecified hierarchy for memory and neural oscillations are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not invent memory-improvement effects, statistical significance, or clinical benefit from the title alone. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Definitions, timing, denominators, quantitative results, and hierarchy for memory and neural measures" }, { "item_id": "N23", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Is no difference in heart rate a different safety outcome?", "needed": "Heart-rate measurement and duration, denominator, effect and interval, and safety role", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Is no difference in heart rate a different safety outcome?", "application_exception": "Do not turn no difference in heart rate into absence of all adverse events or a guarantee of device safety.", "criterion": "Distinguish the original no-difference account from gaps in other harms.", "basis": "M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; status separation is a Chamgap design / M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap adaptation / M19 §19.2.2–19.2.4, M03 §3.2.3; Chamgap adaptation", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original heart-rate materials are provided, distinguish physiological measures from clinical harms.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The existing counterargument and safety explanation state that there was no condition effect on heart rate. The summary contains no heart-rate values, denominators, CIs, P values, or collection definitions.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Quantitative heart-rate estimates, statistics and hierarchy, and clinical harm materials are unverified.", "missingness": "Quantitative heart-rate estimates, statistics and hierarchy, and clinical harm materials are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not turn no difference in heart rate into absence of all adverse events or a guarantee of device safety. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Heart-rate measurement and duration, denominator, effect and interval, and safety role" }, { "item_id": "N24", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Are the hierarchy and selective reporting of all outcomes known?", "needed": "All planned and reported outcomes, prespecified hierarchy, adjustment, and undisclosed outcomes", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are the hierarchy and selective reporting of all outcomes known?", "application_exception": "Do not conclude that outcomes absent from the summary did not exist, or fill missing results with favorable title wording.", "criterion": "Retain the preserved direction while leaving the full reporting scope unverified.", "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; our own application / M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; separation of statuses is our own design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original lists are provided, distinguish reporting status from the scope of the selected table.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original summary contains accounts of N3, N2 onset, and heart rate, but did not name a single prespecified primary endpoint; the full planned and reported outcome lists have not been directly read.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. The full outcome set, prespecified hierarchy, and undisclosed items are unverified.", "missingness": "The full outcome set, prespecified hierarchy, and undisclosed items are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not conclude that outcomes absent from the summary did not exist, or fill missing results with favorable title wording. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "All planned and reported outcomes, prespecified hierarchy, adjustment, and undisclosed outcomes" }, { "item_id": "N25", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "What were shared sleep-environment conditions and other exposures?", "needed": "Shared environment and schedule, concurrent exposures, and baseline characteristics and adjustments", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What were shared sleep-environment conditions and other exposures?", "application_exception": "Do not create sleep-hygiene, medication-adjustment, or lifestyle instructions without original materials.", "criterion": "Distinguish research exposure from gaps in concurrent conditions.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.3, M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; Chamgap adaptation / M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; reverse-direction labels and measurement adaptations are Chamgap designs / M19 §19.2.2–19.2.4 on design considerations; detailed confounding records are a Chamgap design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original condition records are provided, record factors other than movement and actual shared conditions.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Only the rocking, stationary, and measurement conditions are preserved. The summary lacks actual control or changes in light, noise, schedules, habits, and concurrent medication or stimulation.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Concurrent medication and habits, environmental control, and baseline changes are unverified.", "missingness": "Concurrent medication and habits, environmental control, and baseline changes are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not create sleep-hygiene, medication-adjustment, or lifestyle instructions without original materials. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Shared environment and schedule, concurrent exposures, and baseline characteristics and adjustments" }, { "item_id": "N26", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Are missingness, attrition, actual exposure, and valid records verified?", "needed": "Valid nights and pairs, attrition and failures, reasons, missing-data handling, and sensitivity analyses", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are missingness, attrition, actual exposure, and valid records verified?", "application_exception": "Do not use the original scale of 18 people to insert complete pairs, zero attrition, or zero harms.", "criterion": "Distinguish direct gaps in valid data from the original study scale.", "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are our own design / M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application / M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4, M04 §4.6.3; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original flow or analyses are provided, distinguish participant data from valid data and losses for each endpoint.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The account describes 18 people and one night per condition, but the summary lacks measurement failures, interruptions, paired missingness and handling, and actual exposure data.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Actual missingness, attrition, interruptions, and exposure adherence are unverified.", "missingness": "Actual missingness, attrition, interruptions, and exposure adherence are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not use the original scale of 18 people to insert complete pairs, zero attrition, or zero harms. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Valid nights and pairs, attrition and failures, reasons, missing-data handling, and sensitivity analyses" }, { "item_id": "N27", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Is sustained improvement in insomnia the same question?", "needed": "Diagnosed insomnia, repeated use, patient-centered symptoms and function, and follow-up", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Is sustained improvement in insomnia the same question?", "application_exception": "Do not turn the sibling's ? into D or zero effect, or fill it with positive N3 results.", "criterion": "Preserve the sibling's original context without creating a new split, verdict, or treatment guidance.", "basis": "M03 §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.4 on clarifying questions; detailed separation rules are a Chamgap design / M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; dose, persistence, and effect-modification details are Chamgap designs / M03 §3.2.4; Chamgap's own extrapolation boundary", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If direct clinical materials are provided, distinguish the measurement signal from sustained insomnia outcomes.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Another subclaim of the same verdict is sustained improvement in insomnia, with original grade ? and a note that people with insomnia and long-term use were not tested. This is a different clinical gap from the selected one-night N3 question.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Direct results for insomnia and sustained use are unverified within the original scope.", "missingness": "Direct results for insomnia and sustained use are unverified within the original scope.", "uncertainty": "Do not turn the sibling's ? into D or zero effect, or fill it with positive N3 results. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Diagnosed insomnia, repeated use, patient-centered symptoms and function, and follow-up" }, { "item_id": "N28", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Does the evidence answer questions about other frequencies, amplitudes, or optimal conditions?", "needed": "Direct condition comparisons, devices and amplitudes, and prespecified dose or intensity hypotheses", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Does the evidence answer questions about other frequencies, amplitudes, or optimal conditions?", "application_exception": "Do not recommend all rocking, devices, or optimal settings from observations at 0.25 Hz.", "criterion": "Separate the original condition from gaps for other conditions.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; dose, persistence, and effect-modification details are Chamgap designs / M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; reverse-direction labels and measurement adaptations are Chamgap designs", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If materials for other conditions are provided, distinguish their scope from the original comparison.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original exposure is lateral rocking at 0.25 Hz. The summary contains no direct comparison of other frequencies, amplitudes, or devices, or an optimal exposure.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Direct effects for other frequencies, amplitudes, devices, and optimal conditions are unverified.", "missingness": "Direct effects for other frequencies, amplitudes, devices, and optimal conditions are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not recommend all rocking, devices, or optimal settings from observations at 0.25 Hz. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Direct condition comparisons, devices and amplitudes, and prespecified dose or intensity hypotheses" }, { "item_id": "N29", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "What is the scope for other populations, durations, and subgroup effects?", "needed": "Direct population and baseline data, prespecified interactions, and repeated-use and post-cessation follow-up", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What is the scope for other populations, durations, and subgroup effects?", "application_exception": "Do not replicate the overall measurement result as the same effect in other populations or long-term use.", "criterion": "Retain gaps beyond the short, selected scope.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.1; detailed population conditions are our own design / M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; dose, persistence and effect-modification details are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If materials are provided, distinguish the overall short measurement study from separate population and sustained-effect questions.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original population is healthy young adults, with one night per condition. There are no interaction or sustained results for other ages or diseases, sex subgroups, continued use, or after stopping.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Direct effects by population, sustained use, and after cessation are unverified.", "missingness": "Direct effects by population, sustained use, and after cessation are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not replicate the overall measurement result as the same effect in other populations or long-term use. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Direct population and baseline data, prespecified interactions, and repeated-use and post-cessation follow-up" }, { "item_id": "N30", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Are independent replication and numbers of reports or populations determined?", "needed": "Related reports and registrations, unique families, and condition-specific result lists", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are independent replication and numbers of reports or populations determined?", "application_exception": "Do not count two crossover conditions, nights, stages, memory, or sibling tables as independent replication.", "criterion": "Distinguish report slots from undetermined unique counts.", "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 distinction between studies and reports; cohort and outcome linking is our own application / M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original lists are provided, record same, different, and unclear families and report relationships.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The parent's R1 is historical, and the current designated evidence and citation lists each contain one entry. Do not newly certify independent trials, total participants, or replication counts by condition or secondary outcome.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Unique trials, summed participants, and independent replication remain undetermined.", "missingness": "Unique trials, summed participants, and independent replication remain undetermined.", "uncertainty": "Do not count two crossover conditions, nights, stages, memory, or sibling tables as independent replication. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Related reports and registrations, unique families, and condition-specific result lists" }, { "item_id": "N31", "question_type": "Harm information", "question": "How were harms collected prospectively?", "needed": "Safety-event definitions, systematic and spontaneous collection, severity, and discontinuation", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: How were harms collected prospectively?", "application_exception": "Do not turn historical non-reporting or current unread status into zero adverse events.", "criterion": "Distinguish historical limitations in safety information from current unread external materials.", "basis": "M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; detailed distinctions are our own design / M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original safety materials are provided, record actual collection and reporting scope.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original summary states that there were no prespecified safety endpoints or adverse-event table. The external original text has not been read in this work, so direct comparison of that absence is not complete.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Direct harm-collection methods, tables, and safety-event values are unverified.", "missingness": "Direct harm-collection methods, tables, and safety-event values are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not turn historical non-reporting or current unread status into zero adverse events. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Safety-event definitions, systematic and spontaneous collection, severity, and discontinuation" }, { "item_id": "N32", "question_type": "Harm information", "question": "Are harm denominators, events, and time known?", "needed": "Population and time under harm collection, events and people, and periods and conditions", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are harm denominators, events, and time known?", "application_exception": "Do not replicate 18 as a complete safety-analysis denominator or calculate harm frequencies.", "criterion": "Retain gaps in harm information without denominators.", "basis": "M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; our own application / M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; adaptations by study design are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original safety denominators are provided, record them separately from measurement and efficacy denominators.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The scale of 18 people is preserved, but the summary lacks the actual people and nights included in harm collection, exposure time, event counts, and numbers of people with events.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Actual harm denominators, time, and event counts are unverified.", "missingness": "Actual harm denominators, time, and event counts are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not replicate 18 as a complete safety-analysis denominator or calculate harm frequencies. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Population and time under harm collection, events and people, and periods and conditions" }, { "item_id": "N33", "question_type": "Harm information", "question": "What were the timing relationships of harm onset, discontinuation, and recovery?", "needed": "Event timelines, exposure and discontinuation, recovery, and observation windows", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "This condition records the original information and gaps for the question: What were the timing relationships of harm onset, discontinuation, and recovery?", "application_exception": "Do not determine zero harm occurrence or causality from observation after one night alone.", "criterion": "Distinguish original exposure duration from gaps in harm timing.", "basis": "M19 §19.2 concerns harm questions by study design; temporal-relationship details are our own design / M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original event records are provided, distinguish temporal relationships from causality and denominator limitations.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Only the original exposure of one night per condition is preserved. The summary lacks harm onset, cessation, recovery, and re-exposure timing.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Harm-event timing, cessation, recovery, and follow-up are unverified.", "missingness": "Harm-event timing, cessation, recovery, and follow-up are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not determine zero harm occurrence or causality from observation after one night alone. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Event timelines, exposure and discontinuation, recovery, and observation windows" }, { "item_id": "N34", "question_type": "Harm information", "question": "What were harm comparisons, concurrent exposures, and alternative explanations?", "needed": "Actual event-specific comparisons, baseline and concurrent exposures, alternatives, and attribution", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What were harm comparisons, concurrent exposures, and alternative explanations?", "application_exception": "Do not conclude absence of other harms or alternative causes from no difference in heart rate.", "criterion": "Distinguish control and physiological signals from direct harm gaps.", "basis": "M19 §19.2.2–19.2.4, M03 §3.2.3; Chamgap adaptation / M19 §19.2.2–19.2.4 on design considerations; detailed confounding records are a Chamgap design / M03 §3.2.3, M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; Chamgap adaptation", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original safety and condition materials are provided, distinguish physiological measures from harms and alternative explanations.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The stationary control and absence of a heart-rate condition effect are preserved, but the summary lacks comparisons of other clinical harms and attribution involving baseline, environment, and concurrent exposures.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Clinical harm comparisons, event attribution, and alternative explanations are unverified.", "missingness": "Clinical harm comparisons, event attribution, and alternative explanations are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not conclude absence of other harms or alternative causes from no difference in heart rate. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Actual event-specific comparisons, baseline and concurrent exposures, alternatives, and attribution" }, { "item_id": "N35", "question_type": "Harm information", "question": "Are missing harm collection, discontinuation, and completeness verified?", "needed": "Safety reporting and monitoring, discontinuation and omissions, and disclosure scope for all events", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are missing harm collection, discontinuation, and completeness verified?", "application_exception": "Do not turn unread or unreported information into certification that no events occurred.", "criterion": "Retain safety-record limitations separately.", "basis": "M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap adaptation / M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; detailed discrimination is a Chamgap design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original collection and flow records are provided, distinguish reported events from the scope of omissions.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original limitation concerning prespecified safety endpoints and an adverse-event table is preserved. The summary lacks safety completeness, including discontinuers, reporting omissions, and differences in detection and collection.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Completeness of safety collection and discontinued or omitted events are unverified.", "missingness": "Completeness of safety collection and discontinued or omitted events are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not turn unread or unreported information into certification that no events occurred. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Safety reporting and monitoring, discontinuation and omissions, and disclosure scope for all events" }, { "item_id": "N36", "question_type": "Harm information", "question": "Is independent replication of harm signals verified?", "needed": "Unique harm reports and cases, shared populations and recitations, and matching exposures", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Is independent replication of harm signals verified?", "application_exception": "Do not sum the same nights, conditions, sibling tables, or material slots as separate harm replications.", "criterion": "Do not generate undetermined replication counts.", "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2; harm-material adaptations are Chamgap designs / M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 on distinguishing studies from reports; cohort and outcome connections are Chamgap adaptations", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If related original lists are provided, distinguish the same events from records of different families.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "There is one current stored bibliographic and trial context, with no other unique harm-family or event list. This is not a search conclusion that there are zero independent harm materials.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Required direct details are absent from the stored summary and remain unverified. External materials remain unread. Independent harm replication and unique event counts remain undetermined.", "missingness": "Independent harm replication and unique event counts remain undetermined.", "uncertainty": "Do not sum the same nights, conditions, sibling tables, or material slots as separate harm replications. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Unique harm reports and cases, shared populations and recitations, and matching exposures" }, { "item_id": "N37", "question_type": "Harm information", "question": "What are the safety and inference limits beyond the short measurement study?", "needed": "Direct long-term, rare-harm, and population-specific safety materials and suitable follow-up", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What are the safety and inference limits beyond the short measurement study?", "application_exception": "Do not create a new safety grade, causal certification, or device or sleep-treatment use instructions.", "criterion": "Retain the original Unknown status and gaps in extending safety claims.", "basis": "M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap adaptation / Chamgap's own interpretation boundary. M19 principles are referenced; no official causality tool was executed / M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap adaptation", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If direct materials are provided, distinguish the one-night measurement study from separate safety scopes.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Parent safety is Unknown; the original explanation says this was not an adequate safety assessment and reports no heart-rate effect. Overall long-term, rare-harm, or other-population safety cannot be answered by this short measurement study.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Long-term, rare, and vulnerable-population harms and harmlessness are unverified.", "missingness": "Long-term, rare, and vulnerable-population harms and harmlessness are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not create a new safety grade, causal certification, or device or sleep-treatment use instructions. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Direct long-term, rare-harm, and population-specific safety materials and suitable follow-up" }, { "item_id": "N38", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "What were the funding, sponsorship, and institutional roles?", "needed": "Original support and roles, data access, contracts, and declarations", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What were the funding, sponsorship, and institutional roles?", "application_exception": "Do not promote public or university support or the parent's I2 into current certification of independence.", "criterion": "Preserve original support and gaps in roles together.", "basis": "CHAMGAP's own independence and attribution conditions. Official methodological sections used in this pilot do not guarantee every detail of this item / M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original declarations are provided, distinguish supporting institutions from actual operational roles.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Preserve the original summary of support from the Swiss National Science Foundation and University of Geneva. The summary lacks details of each institution's roles in design, analysis, manuscripts, and publication.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. Institution-specific roles and direct comparison with original declarations are unverified.", "missingness": "Institution-specific roles and direct comparison with original declarations are unverified.", "uncertainty": "Do not promote public or university support or the parent's I2 into current certification of independence. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original support and roles, data access, contracts, and declarations" }, { "item_id": "N39", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "What were author disclosures, bed and motor provision, and manufacturer roles?", "needed": "Author declarations, device provision, and manufacturer roles in design, analysis, and manuscripts", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: What were author disclosures, bed and motor provision, and manufacturer roles?", "application_exception": "Do not turn historical non-reporting into certification that there were no device or manufacturer relationships.", "criterion": "Distinguish historical declarations and non-reporting from current gaps in external comparison.", "basis": "Chamgap's own independence and attribution conditions. The official method sections used in this pilot do not endorse all of these detailed items / M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limitations in the current material conversion concern review scope and Chamgap design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If original declarations or provision records are provided, distinguish historical non-reporting from actual roles.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "The original summary states that authors declared no competing interests and that free provision of the bed or motor and manufacturer involvement were not reported in the original text. The original declarations and main text remain unread in this work.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. The full original declarations and device-provision and manufacturer roles have not been directly verified in this work.", "missingness": "The full original declarations and device-provision and manufacturer roles have not been directly verified in this work.", "uncertainty": "Do not turn historical non-reporting into certification that there were no device or manufacturer relationships. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Author declarations, device provision, and manufacturer roles in design, analysis, and manuscripts" }, { "item_id": "N40", "question_type": "Evidence condition", "question": "Are the historical review date, corrections, languages, empty values, and current production distinguished?", "needed": "Original dates, corrections and retractions, languages and empty values, and current reading scope", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "Required to record the original information and gaps for this question as an individual condition: Are the historical review date, corrections, languages, empty values, and current production distinguished?", "application_exception": "Do not borrow the historical review date or cross-checks as a current clinical verification date, or use an empty array to certify absence of all corrections.", "criterion": "Preserve the original history together with current production and incomplete original content review.", "basis": "M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; current material-conversion limits reflect review scope and our own design / M03 §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.4 question-clarification principles; detailed separation rules are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production based on original materials; existing content review remains incomplete", "proposed_research": "If actual update materials are provided, separate the complete original version from a new correction event.", "current_reports": [ "R01" ], "existence": "Original preserved-summary and bibliography links; existence and content of necessary external details remain unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external materials not read", "observation": "Preserve the review date 2026-08-26, the empty correction array, the empty deliberation string, and unrecorded, false, and empty-string values in the Korean and English text and parent assessment axes.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "This is partial confirmation linking the original stored account for production; clinical verification and review are not complete. There are no separate evidence-cutoff or classification records, and no current correction or retraction search has been performed.", "missingness": "There are no separate evidence-cutoff or classification records, and no current correction or retraction search has been performed.", "uncertainty": "Do not borrow the historical review date or cross-checks as a current clinical verification date, or use an empty array to certify absence of all corrections. The original content review remains incomplete, and external original materials have not been directly verified.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Original dates, corrections and retractions, languages and empty values, and current reading scope" } ], "reports": [ { "report_id": "R01", "title": "Perrault AA, Khani A, Quairiaux C, et al. Whole-Night Continuous Rocking Entrains Spontaneous Neural Oscillations with Benefits for Sleep and Memory. Curr Biol. 2019;29:402-411.e3. PMID: 30686735.", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30686735/", "report_type": "Report of a randomized counterbalanced crossover sleep trial", "existence": "Report linked to the original preserved evidence and citation lists", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external abstracts and full texts not read", "study_family": "F01", "independent_replication": false, "observed_result": "One-night N3 proportion per condition in 18 healthy young adults: 27.41%±1.70 SEM versus 22.37%±1.65, Bonferroni-adjusted P=.0006. Historical non-reporting of a 95% CI and no single prespecified primary endpoint named. N2 and heart rate have separate original accounts; total sleep, memory, and sustained insomnia improvement remain direct gaps.", "source_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "materials": [ { "material_type": "Stored summary", "public_status": "Local preserved copy", "access_status": "Local preserved summary acquired", "acquired": true, "actually_read": "Summary read", "as_of": "2026-10-06T17:35:45.490924+09:00", "qualification": "The original evidence list, bibliography, and Korean and English text context in the designated complete JSON were connected for production. This is not reading the external paper." }, { "material_type": "External abstract", "public_status": "Current public availability and detailed existence remain unverified", "access_status": "Access not attempted; not obtained", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": null, "qualification": "The original source link is preserved. Abstract access, reading, and link verification have not been performed in this work." }, { "material_type": "External full text", "public_status": "Current public availability and detailed existence remain unverified", "access_status": "Access not attempted; not obtained", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": null, "qualification": "The original source link connects bibliographic identity and does not mean that the full text was directly acquired or read." }, { "material_type": "External registration", "public_status": "Current public availability and detailed existence remain unverified", "access_status": "Access not attempted; not obtained", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": null, "qualification": "The original registration identifier value Not confirmed is preserved. An actual registration number, existence, and content have not been verified in this work." }, { "material_type": "Required material: protocol", "public_status": "Current public availability and detailed existence remain unverified", "access_status": "Access not attempted; not obtained", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": null, "qualification": "Original materials on population, device, sequence, interval, prespecified endpoints, and safety plans are needed; existence, public availability, and acquisition are unverified." }, { "material_type": "Required material: SAP", "public_status": "Current public availability and detailed existence remain unverified", "access_status": "Access not attempted; not obtained", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": null, "qualification": "Original plans or methods for the paired model, period and sequence, missingness, Bonferroni test family, and effect of interest remain unread." }, { "material_type": "Required material: outcomes, denominators, and harms", "public_status": "Current public availability and detailed existence remain unverified", "access_status": "Access not attempted; not obtained", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": null, "qualification": "Original tables for N3 and SEM, valid pairs, intervals, total sleep, memory, heart rate, and harm collection and denominators are needed and remain unread in this work." }, { "material_type": "Required materials: funding and COI", "public_status": "Current public availability and detailed existence remain unverified", "access_status": "Access not attempted; not obtained", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": null, "qualification": "Support, author disclosures, device and motor provision, and manufacturer roles have not been directly read. Existing declaration and non-reporting accounts are preserved as the historical summary." } ], "links": [ { "label": "PubMed", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30686735/" } ] } ], "method_sources": [ { "id": "M03", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03", "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13", "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.", "review_level": "Methodological principles stated in existing pilot materials and condition templates were referenced. The methodological text was not reviewed again in this work." }, { "id": "M04", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04", "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42", "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.", "review_level": "Methodological principles stated in existing pilot materials and condition templates were referenced. The methodological text was not reviewed again in this work." }, { "id": "M08", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08", "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a", "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.", "review_level": "Methodological principles stated in existing pilot materials and condition templates were referenced. The methodological text was not reviewed again in this work." }, { "id": "M15", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15", "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3", "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.", "review_level": "Methodological principles stated in existing pilot materials and condition templates were referenced. The methodological text was not reviewed again in this work." }, { "id": "M19", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19", "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4", "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.", "review_level": "Methodological principles stated in existing pilot materials and condition templates were referenced. The methodological text was not reviewed again in this work." } ], "status_dictionary": { "Met": "The original content has been reviewed as meeting the conditions. This status is not used in this preparation.", "Partly verified": "Some information in the stored summary was linked during preparation; clinical verification or review is not complete.", "Unverified": "Required direct values, definitions or materials have not been established within the current storage and reading scope. This does not mean zero effect, no papers or failed access.", "Review incomplete": "Review of existing content or actual review incomplete.", "Not reported": "Used only when original materials were actually read and the outcome was judged unreported. Not used for external materials unread in this work.", "Inaccessible": "Used only when an actual access attempt has a recorded failure. Not used for access that was not attempted in this work.", "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Indicates insufficient direct materials for the relevant scope or conditions; it is not a new grade.", "Not applicable": "Used when the reason it does not apply to the original question is stated.", "Conflicting data": "Retains the scope of conflicting statements in original materials; it is not an arbitrary reassessment." }, "study_overlap": { "state": "Unverified", "unique_trial_count": null, "unique_participant_count": null, "reason": "The same people and condition-specific nights in the Perrault 2019 crossover trial; N3, N2, heart rate, memory in the title, and the sibling insomnia context. Preserve registration Not confirmed, without summing conditions, endpoints, or nights as independent replications." }, "history": [ { "date": "2026-10-11", "kind": "Separation of public-facing pages and materials", "view_version": "1.0", "change": "The public page and data were prepared from the existing 40 items. No new clinical search, verification-status change or scoring was performed." } ], "language": "en", "translation_date": "2026-10-11" }