{ "schema_version": "chamgap-public-evidence-check-1.0", "public_id": "v2944-s0", "verdict_number": "2944", "title": "Physiotherapist vocational advice × fewer absence days over four months in workers with musculoskeletal pain: an evidence checklist", "view_version": "1.0", "view_created_date": "2026-10-11", "criteria_version": "1.0", "criteria_date": "2026-10-06", "review_date": null, "legacy_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "review_scope": { "materials_read": "Existing review summaries and stored records of methodological application", "clinical_papers_directly_read": false, "new_clinical_search": false, "limitation": "Review of the existing content is incomplete. External abstracts, full texts, registration records, protocols and SAPs have not been read, and access has not been attempted.", "date_meaning": "This is the date the stored materials were checked, not the date of a new search of the clinical literature." }, "claim_context": { "population": "6 UK primary-care general practices; 338 workers with musculoskeletal pain, 158/180", "intervention": "Original early stepped physiotherapist vocational advice and case management; actual use and components unverified", "dose": null, "comparator": "Exact SWAP control services unverified; distinct from MI-NAV usual case management", "endpoint": "Questionnaire-reported absence days over 4 months; distinguish mean difference from IRR", "duration": "Prespecified four-month primary outcome; SWAP 12-month follow-up context; separate MI-NAV6/12-month reports", "excluded_extensions": [ "Repurposing 6 clusters and 338 people, 158/180, as the same independent units or verified four-month response and analysis denominators", "Changing the mean difference −5.1 days and IRR.51/CI.26–.99 into the same units, model, or interval, or newly calculating a ratio of means or attrition", "Counting the SWAP registration citation as a new clinical trial or effect report, or declaring plan comparison complete from an identifier or prospective-registration summary", "Extending null six-month stratified advice in MI-NAV to motivational interviewing or all time points, or automatically filling the six-month sample with 509", "Changing MI-NAV's 12-month −17.6/−15.6 days, each versus usual management, into direct intervention comparisons or SWAP four-month or follow-up values", "Turning SWAP and MI-NAV differences in delivery and populations, shared authors, or original independence narratives into new independent confirmation or a total of 338+509", "Turning the original £733/£748/£15 economic narrative into new calculations, current-price conversions, or clinical absence-effect values", "Extending a specific early service to all vocational rehabilitation, pain, quality of life, return-to-work rates, or long-term effects", "Adding the same people, groups, nights, time points, citations, registrations, follow-up reports, or sibling tables as new independent trials, participants, or replication", "Turning unreported harms, nonsignificant heart-rate findings, public funding or COI declarations, or unrecorded support or provision into zero events, overall safety, or independence certification", "Turning original registration-not-verified or Not applicable values or delivery-system funding wording into actual registration IDs, support bodies, or current verification of absence", "Filling absent subclaim scores, statuses, or axes with parent values or inheriting past cross-checks as current content review or external reading", "New calculations, hypothetical numbers, effects or CI, reassessment, independence certification, or instructions for sleep treatment, devices, rehabilitation, return to work, exercise, or treatment implementation" ] }, "requirements": [ { "item_id": "N01", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Which exact work-absence question and verdict are preserved?", "needed": "Selected B grade and note, parent B72, and other subclaim questions", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Selected B grade and note, parent B72, and other subclaim questions to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Selected B grade and note, parent B72, and other subclaim questions must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.4 question-clarification principles; detailed separation rules are internally designed; M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limits of this material conversion follow the review scope and internal design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Keep the question, verdict record, and context separate. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02", "S03", "S04" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The selected question is ‘Reduced days off work over 4 months’, with subclaim grade B and an original note of mean difference −5.1 days/IRR.51. Parent B72 is broader context; vocational rehabilitation in general is a separate question.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Subclaim score, status, and axes are absent and are not filled with parent values. The same verdict is not assigned to all rehabilitation. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Subclaim score, status, and axes are absent and are not filled with parent values. The same verdict is not assigned to all rehabilitation.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Correction records for the selected claim and parent assessment" }, { "item_id": "N02", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Who were SWAP's actual workers, and what were the recruitment conditions?", "needed": "Musculoskeletal pain, employment and absence status, recruitment and exclusions, and setting", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Musculoskeletal pain, employment and absence status, recruitment and exclusions, and setting to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Musculoskeletal pain, employment and absence status, recruitment and exclusions, and setting must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.1; detailed population conditions are Chamgap's own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish this population from other work and rehabilitation populations. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original scope is 338 workers with musculoskeletal pain in 6 UK primary-care general practices.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Detailed age, diagnoses, occupations and employment, baseline absence, eligibility and exclusions, and recruitment procedures are unverified. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Detailed age, diagnoses, occupations and employment, baseline absence, eligibility and exclusions, and recruitment procedures are unverified.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Recruitment and baseline work and absence characteristics" }, { "item_id": "N03", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "What were actual vocational advice, case management, and the comparator?", "needed": "Physiotherapists, early stepped service, and interventions and comparators by group", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Physiotherapists, early stepped service, and interventions and comparators by group to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Physiotherapists, early stepped service, and interventions and comparators by group must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; Reverse-direction labels and assessment adaptation are Chamgap design; M03 §3.2.3 and M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; Chamgap application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Link the contribution of the specific service and the comparator separately. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original text records early stepped vocational advice and case management by primary-care physiotherapists.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Detailed components, frequency and intensity, actual use, and exact control services and usual care are unverified. Do not automatically copy MI-NAV's usual case management as SWAP's comparator. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Detailed components, frequency and intensity, actual use, and exact control services and usual care are unverified. Do not automatically copy MI-NAV's usual case management as SWAP's comparator.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "SWAP services by group and actual exposure and comparator records" }, { "item_id": "N04", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Are cluster allocation units distinguished from person counts?", "needed": "Practice clusters, allocation and concealment, baseline balance, and recruitment order", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Practice clusters, allocation and concealment, baseline balance, and recruitment order to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Practice clusters, allocation and concealment, baseline balance, and recruitment order must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M08 §8.1–8.2.3; own application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptation is our own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Record cluster and person samples and denominators separately. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "6 general practices were cluster-randomized, with 338 people: intervention 158/control 180.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Practice counts by group, allocation and concealment, recruitment before or after allocation, and baseline cluster balance are unverified. Person counts do not replace independent allocation units. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Practice counts by group, allocation and concealment, recruitment before or after allocation, and baseline cluster balance are unverified. Person counts do not replace independent allocation units.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Cluster allocation, recruitment, and baseline tables" }, { "item_id": "N05", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "What do questionnaire-reported absence days measure?", "needed": "Four-month absence-day definition, self-report, units and collection, and attribution", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Four-month absence-day definition, self-report, units and collection, and attribution to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Four-month absence-day definition, self-report, units and collection, and attribution must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptation to each question is internally designed; M08 Table 8.2.a, M03 §3.2.4; internal application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; internal application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Keep absence days separate from pain, quality of life, and return-to-work rates. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The selected outcome is questionnaire-reported days off work over 4 months. The original text records it as the prespecified primary outcome.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Paid and unpaid absence, partial days, disease attribution, recall period and corroborating data, handling by current employment status, and measurement blinding are unverified. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Paid and unpaid absence, partial days, disease attribution, recall period and corroborating data, handling by current employment status, and measurement blinding are unverified.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Questionnaire definitions and collection and verification procedures" }, { "item_id": "N06", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "What were the original means and between-group mean difference?", "needed": "Group correspondence, mean days, original difference, and denominators", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Group correspondence, mean days, original difference, and denominators to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Group correspondence, mean days, original difference, and denominators must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design; M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; adaptations by study design are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Separate original means and differences from estimates under other models. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "Preserve mean absence over 4 months of 9.3 versus 14.4 days and the original between-group mean difference of −5.1 days.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Mean variance, denominators, CI, and adjustment and model details are unverified. Do not calculate new differences or ratios from the original means. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Mean variance, denominators, CI, and adjustment and model details are unverified. Do not calculate new differences or ratios from the original means.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Four-month results by group and differences" }, { "item_id": "N07", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Are IRR, CI, and P values for the mean difference?", "needed": "Count-based estimate, interval, test, and cluster and adjusted models", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Count-based estimate, interval, test, and cluster and adjusted models to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Count-based estimate, interval, test, and cluster and adjusted models must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application; M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; Chamgap application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are Chamgap's own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Attribute the definitions and intervals of the mean difference, IRR, and test separately. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "Preserve IRR.51 (95% CI.26–.99), P=.048 as the original 4-month result. It is a different measure from the −5.1-day mean difference.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. The IRR model, denominator and offset, cluster handling, adjustment variables, and mean-difference CI are unverified. Do not use the IRR CI as the day-difference CI or newly calculate a ratio of means. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "The IRR model, denominator and offset, cluster handling, adjustment variables, and mean-difference CI are unverified. Do not use the IRR CI as the day-difference CI or newly calculate a ratio of means.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Cluster and count models, results tables, and SAP" }, { "item_id": "N08", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "What was the original interpretation of 6 clusters and a borderline result?", "needed": "Independent allocation units, precision, model, and original limitations", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Independent allocation units, precision, model, and original limitations to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Independent allocation units, precision, model, and original limitations must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M08 §8.1–8.2.3; our own application; M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Link original limitations to actual intervals and analysis scope. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original text says there were only 6 clusters and uncertainty remained because P=.048 and the original CI indicated a borderline result.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Small-cluster correction, ICC, model and variance, and robustness data are unverified. Do not create new confirmation, probabilities, or effect grades. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Small-cluster correction, ICC, model and variance, and robustness data are unverified. Do not create new confirmation, probabilities, or effect grades.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Cluster analyses, sensitivity analyses, and precision data" }, { "item_id": "N09", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "What were the success threshold and sample-size assumptions?", "needed": "Two-sided level, power, important absence-day difference, and prespecified criteria", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Two-sided level, power, important absence-day difference, and prespecified criteria to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Two-sided level, power, important absence-day difference, and prespecified criteria must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; internal application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; internal application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish significance from a clinically or occupationally important difference. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original text declares a two-sided 5% level and 80% power but says no clinically important absence-day difference was set as a success threshold.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Original sample-size assumptions, ICC, and importance evidence remain unread. Statistical level and power do not substitute for criteria defining an important −5.1-day difference. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Original sample-size assumptions, ICC, and importance evidence remain unread. Statistical level and power do not substitute for criteria defining an important −5.1-day difference.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Sample-size plans and importance evidence" }, { "item_id": "N10", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "What were four-month response, observation and analysis denominators, and attrition?", "needed": "Allocation, questionnaire, completion and analysis, and reasons and handling of missingness by group", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Allocation, questionnaire, completion and analysis, and reasons and handling of missingness by group to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Allocation, questionnaire, completion and analysis, and reasons and handling of missingness by group must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3 and M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Design-specific adaptation is Chamgap design; M08 §8.2.2 and M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish included person counts from actual outcome denominators. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "Preserve original allocation and inclusion counts of 338, 158/180. The original text says the abstract did not give 4-month questionnaire response, so attrition could not be estimated.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Currently required information is unverified in the stored summary. Actual four-month response and analysis denominators, missingness and attrition by group, and handling are unverified. Do not calculate new attrition counts or proportions. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Actual four-month response and analysis denominators, missingness and attrition by group, and handling are unverified. Do not calculate new attrition counts or proportions.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Flowchart and four-month response, denominator, and missing-data tables" }, { "item_id": "N11", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Are analysis populations, adherence, concurrent care, and estimands known?", "needed": "ITT/PP, assignment effect, service use, rescue and other treatment, and missing data", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes ITT/PP, assignment effect, service use, rescue and other treatment, and missing data to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for ITT/PP, assignment effect, service use, rescue and other treatment, and missing data must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.3, M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; our own application; M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish nominal assignment from actual service contributions. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "Only the cluster-randomized design and original results are preserved.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Currently required information is unverified in the stored summary. ITT/PP, service use and changes by group, concurrent treatment, workplace adjustments, rescue interventions, missing data, and sensitivity analyses are unverified. Do not fill in unnamed analyses. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "ITT/PP, service use and changes by group, concurrent treatment, workplace adjustments, rescue interventions, missing data, and sensitivity analyses are unverified. Do not fill in unnamed analyses.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "SAP, use and concurrent care and change records, and sensitivity data" }, { "item_id": "N12", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Are the four-month primary outcome and 12-month follow-up the same result?", "needed": "Selected time point, cumulative period, and follow-up outcomes and denominators", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Selected time point, cumulative period, and follow-up outcomes and denominators to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Selected time point, cumulative period, and follow-up outcomes and denominators must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are internally designed; M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; dose, duration and effect-modification details are internally designed", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Clearly separate different time points and trials. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original narrative says SWAP's primary outcome was absence days over 4 months, with follow-up to 12 months.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. SWAP's 12-month outcomes and denominators and definitions by period are absent from this summary. Do not substitute MI-NAV's 12-month values for SWAP follow-up values. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "SWAP's 12-month outcomes and denominators and definitions by period are absent from this summary. Do not substitute MI-NAV's 12-month values for SWAP follow-up values.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "SWAP follow-up outcome and flow tables" }, { "item_id": "N13", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Is the SWAP registration citation a separate clinical trial?", "needed": "Paper, same ISRCTN registration citation, plans and actual reading", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Paper, same ISRCTN registration citation, plans and actual reading to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Paper, same ISRCTN registration citation, plans and actual reading must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 distinguish studies from reports; cohort and outcome links are our own application; M04 §4.5–4.6 provide collection and selection principles; separating access from reading and the hyperlink convention are our own design; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish a trial's paper, registration materials, and outcomes. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "ISRCTN52269669 in the S01 paper's evidence list and the S02 registration citation link to the same SWAP trial. The original registration summary records absence as the primary outcome.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Registration text and change history remain unread, and access was not attempted. Do not turn 2 citations into 2 independent trials or completed comparison with a prospective plan. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Registration text and change history remain unread, and access was not attempted. Do not turn 2 citations into 2 independent trials or completed comparison with a prospective plan.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Registration history, protocol, and SAP" }, { "item_id": "N14", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Were prespecified primary outcomes, plans, reports, and changes actually compared?", "needed": "Prespecified four-month absence, registration, protocol and SAP, and changes", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Prespecified four-month absence, registration, protocol and SAP, and changes to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Prespecified four-month absence, registration, protocol and SAP, and changes must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application; M04 §4.5–4.6 principles for collecting and selecting materials; separation of access and reading and hyperlink rules are Chamgap's own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish verification levels of plans, reports, and provided materials. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original account of prespecified primary absence over 4 months was linked to the registration citation's primary-absence summary.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. External plans, changes and corrections, selective reporting, and models were not compared. Links and identifiers alone do not establish prespecified agreement. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "External plans, changes and corrections, selective reporting, and models were not compared. Links and identifiers alone do not establish prespecified agreement.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Registration history, protocol, and SAP" }, { "item_id": "N15", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Who supported SWAP, and what were their roles, product support, and COI?", "needed": "NIHR, Arthritis Research UK, Department of Health, and actual roles", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes NIHR, Arthritis Research UK, Department of Health, and actual roles to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for NIHR, Arthritis Research UK, Department of Health, and actual roles must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "Chamgap's own conditions for independence and attribution. The official methodological sections used in this example do not validate every detail of these items.", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish support, products and roles from historical independence language. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "Preserve the stored summary's original account of support from three public or nonprofit bodies.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Support items and amounts, roles, products and free provision, author relationships and patents, analysis, writing and publication support, and individual COI are unverified. Funding alone does not newly certify independence. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Support items and amounts, roles, products and free provision, author relationships and patents, analysis, writing and publication support, and individual COI are unverified. Funding alone does not newly certify independence.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Funding, author and COI, and role disclosures" }, { "item_id": "N16", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Are economic values the same estimates as absence days?", "needed": "Costs and net benefit, units, original calculation history, and time and setting", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Costs and net benefit, units, original calculation history, and time and setting to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Costs and net benefit, units, original calculation history, and time and setting must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design; M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Record economic outcomes separately from absence days over 4 months. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "Preserve the original narrative of £733 net societal benefit per person, £748 lower absence cost, and £15 higher healthcare cost. This arithmetic is an existing historical explanation in the stored summary.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Price basis and denominators, cost categories and intervals, and models are unverified. Do not recalculate, convert to current values, recommend costs, or substitute for absence-day effects. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Price basis and denominators, cost categories and intervals, and models are unverified. Do not recalculate, convert to current values, recommend costs, or substitute for absence-day effects.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Economic analysis and price, time, and denominator data" }, { "item_id": "N17", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "What comparison and outcome did MI-NAV report at six months?", "needed": "NAV delivery, stratified advice and motivational interviewing, usual case management, and six months", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes NAV delivery, stratified advice and motivational interviewing, usual case management, and six months to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for NAV delivery, stratified advice and motivational interviewing, usual case management, and six months must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.1; detailed population conditions are our own design; M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; adaptations for reverse-direction markers and tests are our own design; M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; separation of statuses is our own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish original values and gaps for each intervention and time point. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S03" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original MI-NAV6-month result is a null absence difference for stratified vocational advice versus usual case management. Only the comparator intervention name is supplied for motivational interviewing.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Six-month populations and denominators by group, quantitative stratified-advice results, CI and P, six-month motivational-interviewing values, and original definitions are unverified. Do not extend this to all interventions being null. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Six-month populations and denominators by group, quantitative stratified-advice results, CI and P, six-month motivational-interviewing values, and original definitions are unverified. Do not extend this to all interventions being null.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "MI-NAV six-month methods and group results tables" }, { "item_id": "N18", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "To what comparisons do MI-NAV's two 12-month intervention values belong?", "needed": "509 participants, each intervention versus usual management, original differences and intervals, and period", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes 509 participants, each intervention versus usual management, original differences and intervals, and period to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for 509 participants, each intervention versus usual management, original differences and intervals, and period must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; adaptations by study design are our own design; M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Retain effects and the original significance account by intervention, comparator, and time point. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S04" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "In the 12-month trial of 509 participants, stratified advice −17.6 days (CI−33.0 to −2.2) and motivational interviewing −15.6 days (CI−31.0 to −0.2) are original values, each versus usual case management.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Group denominators and analyses, exact definitions, direct differences between the two interventions, interactions, and P are unverified. Do not repurpose them as direct intervention comparisons, new differences, or SWAP four-month values. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Group denominators and analyses, exact definitions, direct differences between the two interventions, interactions, and P are unverified. Do not repurpose them as direct intervention comparisons, new differences, or SWAP four-month values.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "MI-NAV 12-month methods and group results tables" }, { "item_id": "N19", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Do the null six-month and positive 12-month results conflict at the same time point?", "needed": "Sequential reports of the same MI-NAV trial, time points and populations, and different analyses", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Sequential reports of the same MI-NAV trial, time points and populations, and different analyses to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Sequential reports of the same MI-NAV trial, time points and populations, and different analyses must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 distinguish studies from reports; cohort and outcome links are our own application; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; separation of statuses is our own design; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; details of dose, duration, and effect modification are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish different time points in one trial from independent studies. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S03", "S04" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original text says conclusions differed by time point: null at 6 months and positive at 12 months. Link the two reports through the MI-NAV relationship.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Exact time-point links between participants, models and denominators, and changes by period are unverified. Do not turn them into conflicting data under the same conditions, new independent replication, or duplicated totals of 509 participants. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Exact time-point links between participants, models and denominators, and changes by period are unverified. Do not turn them into conflicting data under the same conditions, new independent replication, or duplicated totals of 509 participants.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Flow and analyses by time point and related-report links" }, { "item_id": "N20", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Do SWAP and MI-NAV share delivery and populations or provide independent confirmation?", "needed": "UK primary care versus NAV, populations and programmes, shared authors, and roles and funding", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes UK primary care versus NAV, populations and programmes, shared authors, and roles and funding to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for UK primary care versus NAV, populations and programmes, shared authors, and roles and funding must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; Chamgap independence and attribution conditions. Official method sections used in this pilot do not guarantee every detail of these items; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 distinguish studies from reports; cohort and outcome links are our own application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Separate different settings and programmes from the scope of independence verification. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S03", "S04" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "Preserve the original account that SWAP embedded advisers in UK primary care, MI-NAV used Norway's NAV, and shared authors meant it was not counted as independent confirmation. Parent R1 is history.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. External comparisons of actual populations, programmes, investigators, and funding independence have not been performed. Do not retroactively use the stored wording as new independence certification. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "External comparisons of actual populations, programmes, investigators, and funding independence have not been performed. Do not retroactively use the stored wording as new independence certification.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Trial-specific populations and interventions and author, funding, and role materials" }, { "item_id": "N21", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Do MI-NAV's funding and registration identifiers establish actual funding and identity?", "needed": "NAV delivery and shared-author wording, Not applicable, support and COI, and plans", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes NAV delivery and shared-author wording, Not applicable, support and COI, and plans to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for NAV delivery and shared-author wording, Not applicable, support and COI, and plans must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "Chamgap independence and attribution conditions. Official method sections used in this pilot do not guarantee every detail of these items; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; our own application; M04 §4.5–4.6 provide collection and selection principles; separating access from reading and the hyperlink convention are our own design; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; adaptations by study design are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish delivery, funding, identity, and time-point denominators. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S03", "S04" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The S03/S04 funding information describes NAV delivery and shared authors; the registration identifier value is ‘Not applicable’. Delivery-system wording is not verification of the actual provider.", "condition_status": "Unverified", "status_reason": "Currently required information is unverified in the stored summary. MI-NAV's actual funding, products, author COI, registration, plans, and changes are unverified. Do not automatically fill the 6-month sample label ‘MI-NAV participants’ with 509 or use Not applicable as certification of absence. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "MI-NAV's actual funding, products, author COI, registration, plans, and changes are unverified. Do not automatically fill the 6-month sample label ‘MI-NAV participants’ with 509 or use Not applicable as certification of absence.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "MI-NAV registration, support and roles, and original methods" }, { "item_id": "N22", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "How are reports, registration, and follow-up time points linked into trial families?", "needed": "SWAP paper and registration, MI-NAV6/12, and bibliographic and population overlap", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes SWAP paper and registration, MI-NAV6/12, and bibliographic and population overlap to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for SWAP paper and registration, MI-NAV6/12, and bibliographic and population overlap must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "Study/report distinction in M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2; Cohort/outcome linkage is Chamgap application; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 and M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Separate report counts from unique trials, participants, and replication. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02", "S03", "S04" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "Link the 4 report entries as the SWAP paper and same registration and MI-NAV6/12 time points. Separate clinical reports from registration citations.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. External originals and cohort identities have not been compared. Do not sum 4 citations, 338/509 participants, or different groups and time points into 4 new independent trials or total participants; retain unrecorded unique clinical totals. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "External originals and cohort identities have not been compared. Do not sum 4 citations, 338/509 participants, or different groups and time points into 4 new independent trials or total participants; retain unrecorded unique clinical totals.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Related reports, registrations, and participant links by time point" }, { "item_id": "N23", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Can pain, quality of life, return to work, or long-term outcomes replace the absence benefit?", "needed": "Selected four-month days, secondary outcomes, and other periods and function", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Selected four-month days, secondary outcomes, and other periods and function to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Selected four-month days, secondary outcomes, and other periods and function must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; details of dose, duration, and effect modification are our own design; M03 §3.2.4; our own boundary on extensions; M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Keep results for each clinical, occupational, and economic question separate. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S03", "S04" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original text explicitly says pain and quality-of-life secondary outcomes should not substitute for the absence benefit. The current selected outcome is days over 4 months.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Secondary values, return-to-work rates and sustained employment, long-term effects, and occupation-specific subgroups are unverified. Do not calculate return-to-work events or treatment efficacy from absence days. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Secondary values, return-to-work rates and sustained employment, long-term effects, and occupation-specific subgroups are unverified. Do not calculate return-to-work events or treatment efficacy from absence days.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Separate outcomes, follow-up, and subgroup materials" }, { "item_id": "N24", "question_type": "Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy table", "question": "What do unassessed safety and no reported harm signal mean?", "needed": "Serious events, collection and denominators and periods, discontinuation, and original limitations", "role": "Supplementary", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Serious events, collection and denominators and periods, discontinuation, and original limitations to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Address gaps in safety materials for the selected subclaim. Do not judge safety from N3/heart rate, absence days, or parent safety wording, or create new harm incidence or instructions for sleep treatment, devices, or rehabilitation.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Serious events, collection and denominators and periods, discontinuation, and original limitations must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap's own application; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; detailed distinctions are Chamgap's own design; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap's own application; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap's own application; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap's own application; Chamgap's own interpretive boundary. M19 principles are referenced; no official causality tool was run", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Separate efficacy absence days from the scope of safety verification. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original text says serious adverse events were not assessed as a separate outcome and no harm signal was reported.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Systematic harm collection, events and denominators, timing, discontinuation, baseline factors and concurrent care, and long-term harms are unverified. Do not turn nonreporting into certification of safety for all rehabilitation or zero events. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Systematic harm collection, events and denominators, timing, discontinuation, baseline factors and concurrent care, and long-term harms are unverified. Do not turn nonreporting into certification of safety for all rehabilitation or zero events.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Harm collection and events, discontinuation, and follow-up data" }, { "item_id": "N25", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Is the result extended to vocational rehabilitation generally, other settings, or action instructions?", "needed": "Specific early service, countries, delivery and occupations, and original scope", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Specific early service, countries, delivery and occupations, and original scope to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Specific early service, countries, delivery and occupations, and original scope must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M03 §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.4 provide principles for clarifying questions; detailed separation rules are our own design; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; details of dose, duration, and effect modification are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish the original service from the scope of extension questions. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S03", "S04" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The original text restricts the result to the specific early stepped physiotherapist service in UK primary care and does not extend it to a universal benefit of all vocational rehabilitation.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. Direct identical outcomes for other programmes, settings, and occupations are unverified. Do not create instructions for rehabilitation, return to work, work adjustments, treatment actions, devices, or exercise. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "Direct identical outcomes for other programmes, settings, and occupations are unverified. Do not create instructions for rehabilitation, return to work, work adjustments, treatment actions, devices, or exercise.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Separate populations, services, and occupational-setting materials" }, { "item_id": "N26", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "What history is recorded by parent B72, axes, Korean and English text, dates, and empty corrections?", "needed": "Selected B grade, parent values and null and false and empty values, and past cross-check", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Selected B grade, parent values and null and false and empty values, and past cross-check to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Selected B grade, parent values and null and false and empty values, and past cross-check must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; current material-conversion limits reflect review scope and our own design; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; status distinctions are our own design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Separate the original version from production and change events. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02", "S03", "S04" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "Preserve parent B72, Unknown safety, unrecorded precision and false flags, empty grade-override reasons, Korean and English text, 2026-08-26, empty corrections and deliberation, and the past cross-check in the complete stored summary.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. This is not a current search, correction or retraction verification, completed content review, or certification of subclaim scores, axes, or independence. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "This is not a current search, correction or retraction verification, completed content review, or certification of subclaim scores, axes, or independence.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Corrections, user comments and supplied original materials" }, { "item_id": "N27", "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material", "question": "Which summaries and citations were read, and which external materials remain unread?", "needed": "3 evidence entries and 4 citations, registration citation, and paper, plan, and disclosure statuses", "role": "Required", "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes 3 evidence entries and 4 citations, registration citation, and paper, plan, and disclosure statuses to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.", "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.", "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for 3 evidence entries and 4 citations, registration citation, and paper, plan, and disclosure statuses must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.", "basis": "M04 §4.5–4.6 material collection/selection principles; acquisition/reading separation and hyperlink specifications are internally designed; M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limits of this material conversion follow the review scope and internal design", "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review", "proposed_research": "Distinguish existence, acquisition, actual reading, and material types. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed.", "current_reports": [ "S01", "S02", "S03", "S04" ], "existence": "Stored summary/bibliography links; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "observation": "The complete stored summary, 3 evidence entries, and 4 citations were read for production, and original source links were connected. S02 is the SWAP registration citation; external registration materials remain unread. Summaries are marked ‘Summary read’, and external materials ‘Not read’.", "condition_status": "Partly verified", "status_reason": "Only the relevant information from the stored summary is recorded. Detailed original materials have not been read, and the original content review remains incomplete. External papers, registrations, protocols, SAPs, and disclosures remain unread, and access was not attempted. Do not inherit past abstract or registration narratives or existing links as current acquisition or completed review. The original content review remains incomplete.", "missingness": "External papers, registrations, protocols, SAPs, and disclosures remain unread, and access was not attempted. Do not inherit past abstract or registration narratives or existing links as current acquisition or completed review.", "uncertainty": "This record links preserved-summary statements; it does not establish external-paper comparison, a new efficacy verdict or completed content review.", "review_date": null, "reading_status": "Full text not read · Stored summary read", "additional_material": "Each material and actual reading history" } ], "reports": [ { "report_id": "S01", "title": "Wynne-Jones G et al. 2018 SWAP", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28976423/", "report_type": "Six-practice cluster-randomized trial", "existence": "Stored bibliography exists; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "study_family": "RG2944-SWAP", "independent_replication": null, "observed_result": "9.3 versus 14.4 days; mean difference −5.1 days; IRR0.51 (0.26–0.99), P=0.048. Original means and differences and IRR are different measures. Do not use the IRR CI as the mean-difference CI or newly calculate differences, ratios, missingness, or prices. Retain 6 clusters, the borderline result, unverified four-month response, and original economic values £733/£748/£15 in their respective contexts.", "result_level": "Outcome wording in the stored summary", "source_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "materials": [ { "material_type": "Stored summary", "public_status": "Stored file", "access_status": "Stored summary", "acquired": true, "actually_read": "Summary read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Only the stored JSON summary and bibliography were used for production. This does not constitute external verification or completed content review." }, { "material_type": "External paper", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Registration material", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Protocol", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Statistical analysis plan", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Funding, product-support and COI material", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." } ], "links": [ { "label": "PubMed", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28976423/" } ] }, { "report_id": "S02", "title": "ISRCTN52269669. SWAP - Study of Work And Pain.", "url": "https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN52269669", "report_type": "SWAP trial-registration citation; external registration text unread", "existence": "Stored bibliography exists; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "study_family": "RG2944-SWAP", "independent_replication": null, "observed_result": "The registered primary outcome was work absence. This is the original wording in the preserved registration citation summary, not current external registration reading, verification of outcome changes, approval of a prespecified plan, or a new clinical result.", "result_level": "Outcome wording in the stored summary", "source_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "materials": [ { "material_type": "Stored summary", "public_status": "Stored file", "access_status": "Stored summary", "acquired": true, "actually_read": "Summary read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Only the stored JSON summary and bibliography were used for production. This does not constitute external verification or completed content review." }, { "material_type": "External registration materials", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Registration change history", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Protocol", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Statistical analysis plan", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Funding, product-support and COI material", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." } ], "links": [ { "label": "Official source", "url": "https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN52269669" } ] }, { "report_id": "S03", "title": "MI-NAV six-month trial", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36428098/", "report_type": "Randomized trial of motivational interviewing or stratified vocational advice versus usual case management", "existence": "Stored bibliography exists; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "study_family": "RG2944-MI-NAV", "independent_replication": null, "observed_result": "Null work-absence difference for stratified vocational advice: the original account for that six-month intervention. Group values, CI, P, denominators, and the six-month motivational-interviewing effect are unverified; do not fill these with a new zero effect, equivalence, or a denominator of 509.", "result_level": "Outcome wording in the stored summary", "source_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "materials": [ { "material_type": "Stored summary", "public_status": "Stored file", "access_status": "Stored summary", "acquired": true, "actually_read": "Summary read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Only the stored JSON summary and bibliography were used for production. This does not constitute external verification or completed content review." }, { "material_type": "External paper", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Registration material", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Protocol", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Statistical analysis plan", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Funding, product-support and COI material", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." } ], "links": [ { "label": "PubMed", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36428098/" } ] }, { "report_id": "S04", "title": "MI-NAV 12-month trial", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40927942/", "report_type": "Randomized trial of motivational interviewing or stratified vocational advice versus usual case management", "existence": "Stored bibliography exists; external identity unverified", "acquired_read": "Summary read; external material unread", "study_family": "RG2944-MI-NAV", "independent_replication": null, "observed_result": "Stratified vocational advice −17.6 days (95% CI−33.0 to −2.2), motivational interviewing −15.6 days (95% CI−31.0 to −0.2), each versus usual case management. Each is an original value versus the same usual case management. Do not calculate or repurpose them as a difference between interventions, a new effect, combined time points, or SWAP follow-up values.", "result_level": "Outcome wording in the stored summary", "source_evidence_date": "2026-08-26", "materials": [ { "material_type": "Stored summary", "public_status": "Stored file", "access_status": "Stored summary", "acquired": true, "actually_read": "Summary read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "Only the stored JSON summary and bibliography were used for production. This does not constitute external verification or completed content review." }, { "material_type": "External paper", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Registration material", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Protocol", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Statistical analysis plan", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." }, { "material_type": "Funding, product-support and COI material", "public_status": "Public availability unverified; only bibliography links preserved", "access_status": "Unread; access not attempted", "acquired": false, "actually_read": "Not read", "as_of": "2026-08-26", "qualification": "No external access or click testing was performed in the original preparation. URLs or registration identifiers alone do not upgrade acquisition/reading status." } ], "links": [ { "label": "PubMed", "url": "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40927942/" } ] } ], "method_sources": [ { "id": "M03", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03", "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13", "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.", "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution" }, { "id": "M04", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04", "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42", "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.", "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution" }, { "id": "M08", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08", "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a", "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.", "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution" }, { "id": "M15", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15", "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3", "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.", "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution" }, { "id": "M19", "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10", "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19", "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4", "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.", "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution" } ], "status_dictionary": { "Met": "Status for necessary evidence confirmed after existing content review. No completion is declared in the current presentation.", "Partly verified": "Some information in the stored summary is linked into the table. External comparison/content review is not complete.", "Unverified": "The article leaves this unverified, or required material is absent from the current stored summary. This is distinct from zero, absence or safety.", "Review incomplete": "Existing content review remains incomplete.", "Not reported": "Not reported within the stored material actually read; not extended to the entire primary paper.", "Inaccessible": "Means an actual access failure. Access not attempted here is not assigned this state.", "Not applicable": "Not used as a substitute for an evidence gap.", "Conflicting data": "Requires an observed disagreement under the same comparison criteria; not automatically judged in this production.", "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Marks a gap in additional material required by the selected conditions; not a new efficacy grade." }, "study_overlap": { "state": "Unverified", "unique_trial_count": null, "unique_participant_count": null, "reason": "S01, the SWAP paper, and S02, the ISRCTN52269669 registration citation, concern the same 6-practice UK cluster trial. Distinguish 338 participants, 158/180, prespecified four-month questionnaire-reported absence, and 12-month follow-up context. Retain unverified four-month response and attrition, cluster-model details, and the different measures of mean difference and IRR; do not count the registration citation as a new clinical trial. Report and material entries are not totals of unique clinical trials, participants, or independent replication; unique totals remain null. Original replication and independence axes and past narratives are not retroactively certified as current identity or independence verification. S02 cites the ISRCTN52269669 SWAP registration and links to the same trial as S01 and the first original evidence entry. Primary absence and prospective registration in the original short citation summary are preserved summaries; actual registration and change history have not been read in this work. No clinical effects, people, or independent trials are added. Report and material entries are not unique clinical totals, and historical axes and narratives do not certify current identity or independence. S03 MI-NAV6 months and S04 MI-NAV12 months are linked as time-point reports of the later MI-NAV trial in the original text. S03 gives only ‘MI-NAV participants’ for sample size; S04's 509 is not automatically transferred. Null six-month stratified advice and positive 12-month results for both interventions concern different time points and are not new identical direct replication of SWAP4 months. Report and material entries do not establish unique clinical totals, which remain null, and historical axes and narratives do not certify current identity or independence. S04 MI-NAV12 months gives 509 participants and separate stratified-advice and motivational-interviewing values, each versus usual case management. Link it to S03's six-month context for the same MI-NAV trial; exact connections of observation, denominators, and models by period remain unverified. Do not add 509 participants, the two interventions, or different time points as independent trials or participants. Report and material entries do not establish unique clinical totals, which remain null, and historical axes and narratives do not certify current identity or independence." }, "history": [ { "date": "2026-10-11", "kind": "Separation of public-facing pages and materials", "view_version": "1.0", "change": "Public pages and materials were prepared from the existing 27 items. No new clinical search, verification-status change or scoring was performed." } ], "language": "en", "translation_date": "2026-10-11" }