{
  "schema_version": "chamgap-public-criteria-1.0",
  "title": "Physiotherapist vocational advice × fewer absence days over four months in workers with musculoskeletal pain: an evidence checklist",
  "language": "en",
  "translation_date": "2026-10-11",
  "criteria_version": "1.0",
  "criteria_date": "2026-10-06",
  "condition_origin": "Chamgap's own application conditions",
  "method_sources": [
    {
      "id": "M03",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03",
      "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13",
      "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M04",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04",
      "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M08",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08",
      "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a",
      "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M15",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15",
      "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M19",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19",
      "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4",
      "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    }
  ],
  "status_dictionary": {
    "Met": "Status for necessary evidence confirmed after existing content review. No completion is declared in the current presentation.",
    "Partly verified": "Some information in the stored summary is linked into the table. External comparison/content review is not complete.",
    "Unverified": "The article leaves this unverified, or required material is absent from the current stored summary. This is distinct from zero, absence or safety.",
    "Review incomplete": "Existing content review remains incomplete.",
    "Not reported": "Not reported within the stored material actually read; not extended to the entire primary paper.",
    "Inaccessible": "Means an actual access failure. Access not attempted here is not assigned this state.",
    "Not applicable": "Not used as a substitute for an evidence gap.",
    "Conflicting data": "Requires an observed disagreement under the same comparison criteria; not automatically judged in this production.",
    "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Marks a gap in additional material required by the selected conditions; not a new efficacy grade."
  },
  "requirements": [
    {
      "item_id": "N01",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Which exact work-absence question and verdict are preserved?",
      "needed": "Selected B grade and note, parent B72, and other subclaim questions",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Selected B grade and note, parent B72, and other subclaim questions to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Selected B grade and note, parent B72, and other subclaim questions must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.4 question-clarification principles; detailed separation rules are internally designed; M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limits of this material conversion follow the review scope and internal design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Keep the question, verdict record, and context separate. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N02",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Who were SWAP's actual workers, and what were the recruitment conditions?",
      "needed": "Musculoskeletal pain, employment and absence status, recruitment and exclusions, and setting",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Musculoskeletal pain, employment and absence status, recruitment and exclusions, and setting to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Musculoskeletal pain, employment and absence status, recruitment and exclusions, and setting must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.1; detailed population conditions are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish this population from other work and rehabilitation populations. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N03",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What were actual vocational advice, case management, and the comparator?",
      "needed": "Physiotherapists, early stepped service, and interventions and comparators by group",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Physiotherapists, early stepped service, and interventions and comparators by group to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Physiotherapists, early stepped service, and interventions and comparators by group must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; Reverse-direction labels and assessment adaptation are Chamgap design; M03 §3.2.3 and M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Link the contribution of the specific service and the comparator separately. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N04",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are cluster allocation units distinguished from person counts?",
      "needed": "Practice clusters, allocation and concealment, baseline balance, and recruitment order",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Practice clusters, allocation and concealment, baseline balance, and recruitment order to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Practice clusters, allocation and concealment, baseline balance, and recruitment order must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 §8.1–8.2.3; own application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptation is our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Record cluster and person samples and denominators separately. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N05",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What do questionnaire-reported absence days measure?",
      "needed": "Four-month absence-day definition, self-report, units and collection, and attribution",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Four-month absence-day definition, self-report, units and collection, and attribution to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Four-month absence-day definition, self-report, units and collection, and attribution must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptation to each question is internally designed; M08 Table 8.2.a, M03 §3.2.4; internal application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; internal application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Keep absence days separate from pain, quality of life, and return-to-work rates. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N06",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What were the original means and between-group mean difference?",
      "needed": "Group correspondence, mean days, original difference, and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Group correspondence, mean days, original difference, and denominators to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Group correspondence, mean days, original difference, and denominators must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design; M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; adaptations by study design are our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate original means and differences from estimates under other models. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N07",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are IRR, CI, and P values for the mean difference?",
      "needed": "Count-based estimate, interval, test, and cluster and adjusted models",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Count-based estimate, interval, test, and cluster and adjusted models to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Count-based estimate, interval, test, and cluster and adjusted models must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application; M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; Chamgap application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Attribute the definitions and intervals of the mean difference, IRR, and test separately. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N08",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What was the original interpretation of 6 clusters and a borderline result?",
      "needed": "Independent allocation units, precision, model, and original limitations",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Independent allocation units, precision, model, and original limitations to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Independent allocation units, precision, model, and original limitations must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 §8.1–8.2.3; our own application; M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; our own application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Link original limitations to actual intervals and analysis scope. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N09",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What were the success threshold and sample-size assumptions?",
      "needed": "Two-sided level, power, important absence-day difference, and prespecified criteria",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Two-sided level, power, important absence-day difference, and prespecified criteria to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Two-sided level, power, important absence-day difference, and prespecified criteria must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; internal application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; internal application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish significance from a clinically or occupationally important difference. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N10",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What were four-month response, observation and analysis denominators, and attrition?",
      "needed": "Allocation, questionnaire, completion and analysis, and reasons and handling of missingness by group",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Allocation, questionnaire, completion and analysis, and reasons and handling of missingness by group to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Allocation, questionnaire, completion and analysis, and reasons and handling of missingness by group must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3 and M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Design-specific adaptation is Chamgap design; M08 §8.2.2 and M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish included person counts from actual outcome denominators. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N11",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are analysis populations, adherence, concurrent care, and estimands known?",
      "needed": "ITT/PP, assignment effect, service use, rescue and other treatment, and missing data",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes ITT/PP, assignment effect, service use, rescue and other treatment, and missing data to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for ITT/PP, assignment effect, service use, rescue and other treatment, and missing data must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.3, M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; our own application; M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish nominal assignment from actual service contributions. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N12",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are the four-month primary outcome and 12-month follow-up the same result?",
      "needed": "Selected time point, cumulative period, and follow-up outcomes and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Selected time point, cumulative period, and follow-up outcomes and denominators to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Selected time point, cumulative period, and follow-up outcomes and denominators must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are internally designed; M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; dose, duration and effect-modification details are internally designed",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Clearly separate different time points and trials. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N13",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Is the SWAP registration citation a separate clinical trial?",
      "needed": "Paper, same ISRCTN registration citation, plans and actual reading",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Paper, same ISRCTN registration citation, plans and actual reading to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Paper, same ISRCTN registration citation, plans and actual reading must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 distinguish studies from reports; cohort and outcome links are our own application; M04 §4.5–4.6 provide collection and selection principles; separating access from reading and the hyperlink convention are our own design; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; our own application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish a trial's paper, registration materials, and outcomes. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N14",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Were prespecified primary outcomes, plans, reports, and changes actually compared?",
      "needed": "Prespecified four-month absence, registration, protocol and SAP, and changes",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Prespecified four-month absence, registration, protocol and SAP, and changes to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Prespecified four-month absence, registration, protocol and SAP, and changes must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application; M04 §4.5–4.6 principles for collecting and selecting materials; separation of access and reading and hyperlink rules are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish verification levels of plans, reports, and provided materials. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N15",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Who supported SWAP, and what were their roles, product support, and COI?",
      "needed": "NIHR, Arthritis Research UK, Department of Health, and actual roles",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes NIHR, Arthritis Research UK, Department of Health, and actual roles to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for NIHR, Arthritis Research UK, Department of Health, and actual roles must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "Chamgap's own conditions for independence and attribution. The official methodological sections used in this example do not validate every detail of these items.",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish support, products and roles from historical independence language. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N16",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are economic values the same estimates as absence days?",
      "needed": "Costs and net benefit, units, original calculation history, and time and setting",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Costs and net benefit, units, original calculation history, and time and setting to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Costs and net benefit, units, original calculation history, and time and setting must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design; M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; our own application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Record economic outcomes separately from absence days over 4 months. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N17",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What comparison and outcome did MI-NAV report at six months?",
      "needed": "NAV delivery, stratified advice and motivational interviewing, usual case management, and six months",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes NAV delivery, stratified advice and motivational interviewing, usual case management, and six months to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for NAV delivery, stratified advice and motivational interviewing, usual case management, and six months must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.1; detailed population conditions are our own design; M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; adaptations for reverse-direction markers and tests are our own design; M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; separation of statuses is our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish original values and gaps for each intervention and time point. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N18",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "To what comparisons do MI-NAV's two 12-month intervention values belong?",
      "needed": "509 participants, each intervention versus usual management, original differences and intervals, and period",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes 509 participants, each intervention versus usual management, original differences and intervals, and period to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for 509 participants, each intervention versus usual management, original differences and intervals, and period must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; adaptations by study design are our own design; M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Retain effects and the original significance account by intervention, comparator, and time point. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N19",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Do the null six-month and positive 12-month results conflict at the same time point?",
      "needed": "Sequential reports of the same MI-NAV trial, time points and populations, and different analyses",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Sequential reports of the same MI-NAV trial, time points and populations, and different analyses to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Sequential reports of the same MI-NAV trial, time points and populations, and different analyses must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 distinguish studies from reports; cohort and outcome links are our own application; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; separation of statuses is our own design; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; details of dose, duration, and effect modification are our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish different time points in one trial from independent studies. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N20",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Do SWAP and MI-NAV share delivery and populations or provide independent confirmation?",
      "needed": "UK primary care versus NAV, populations and programmes, shared authors, and roles and funding",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes UK primary care versus NAV, populations and programmes, shared authors, and roles and funding to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for UK primary care versus NAV, populations and programmes, shared authors, and roles and funding must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; Chamgap independence and attribution conditions. Official method sections used in this pilot do not guarantee every detail of these items; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 distinguish studies from reports; cohort and outcome links are our own application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate different settings and programmes from the scope of independence verification. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N21",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Do MI-NAV's funding and registration identifiers establish actual funding and identity?",
      "needed": "NAV delivery and shared-author wording, Not applicable, support and COI, and plans",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes NAV delivery and shared-author wording, Not applicable, support and COI, and plans to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for NAV delivery and shared-author wording, Not applicable, support and COI, and plans must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "Chamgap independence and attribution conditions. Official method sections used in this pilot do not guarantee every detail of these items; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; our own application; M04 §4.5–4.6 provide collection and selection principles; separating access from reading and the hyperlink convention are our own design; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; adaptations by study design are our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish delivery, funding, identity, and time-point denominators. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N22",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "How are reports, registration, and follow-up time points linked into trial families?",
      "needed": "SWAP paper and registration, MI-NAV6/12, and bibliographic and population overlap",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes SWAP paper and registration, MI-NAV6/12, and bibliographic and population overlap to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for SWAP paper and registration, MI-NAV6/12, and bibliographic and population overlap must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "Study/report distinction in M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2; Cohort/outcome linkage is Chamgap application; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 and M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate report counts from unique trials, participants, and replication. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N23",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Can pain, quality of life, return to work, or long-term outcomes replace the absence benefit?",
      "needed": "Selected four-month days, secondary outcomes, and other periods and function",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Selected four-month days, secondary outcomes, and other periods and function to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Selected four-month days, secondary outcomes, and other periods and function must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; details of dose, duration, and effect modification are our own design; M03 §3.2.4; our own boundary on extensions; M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; outcome adaptations by question are our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Keep results for each clinical, occupational, and economic question separate. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N24",
      "question_type": "Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy table",
      "question": "What do unassessed safety and no reported harm signal mean?",
      "needed": "Serious events, collection and denominators and periods, discontinuation, and original limitations",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Serious events, collection and denominators and periods, discontinuation, and original limitations to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Address gaps in safety materials for the selected subclaim. Do not judge safety from N3/heart rate, absence days, or parent safety wording, or create new harm incidence or instructions for sleep treatment, devices, or rehabilitation.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Serious events, collection and denominators and periods, discontinuation, and original limitations must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap's own application; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; detailed distinctions are Chamgap's own design; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap's own application; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap's own application; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap's own application; Chamgap's own interpretive boundary. M19 principles are referenced; no official causality tool was run",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate efficacy absence days from the scope of safety verification. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N25",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Is the result extended to vocational rehabilitation generally, other settings, or action instructions?",
      "needed": "Specific early service, countries, delivery and occupations, and original scope",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Specific early service, countries, delivery and occupations, and original scope to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Specific early service, countries, delivery and occupations, and original scope must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.4 provide principles for clarifying questions; detailed separation rules are our own design; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; details of dose, duration, and effect modification are our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the original service from the scope of extension questions. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N26",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What history is recorded by parent B72, axes, Korean and English text, dates, and empty corrections?",
      "needed": "Selected B grade, parent values and null and false and empty values, and past cross-check",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes Selected B grade, parent values and null and false and empty values, and past cross-check to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for Selected B grade, parent values and null and false and empty values, and past cross-check must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; current material-conversion limits reflect review scope and our own design; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; status distinctions are our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate the original version from production and change events. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N27",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Which summaries and citations were read, and which external materials remain unread?",
      "needed": "3 evidence entries and 4 citations, registration citation, and paper, plan, and disclosure statuses",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This production item distinguishes 3 evidence entries and 4 citations, registration citation, and paper, plan, and disclosure statuses to connect materials required for the selected question with currently available materials.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Relevant original materials and analysis scope for 3 evidence entries and 4 citations, registration citation, and paper, plan, and disclosure statuses must be provided so unverified matters can be distinguished. The stored wording is linked here, and the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.5–4.6 material collection/selection principles; acquisition/reading separation and hyperlink specifications are internally designed; M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limits of this material conversion follow the review scope and internal design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish existence, acquisition, actual reading, and material types. This is a proposal; the record notes that no new research, calculation, or trial was performed."
    }
  ]
}