{
  "schema_version": "chamgap-public-criteria-1.0",
  "title": "Two-year balance training × reduced serious injurious falls in women aged 75–85 with impaired balance: an evidence checklist",
  "language": "en",
  "translation_date": "2026-10-11",
  "criteria_version": "1.0",
  "criteria_date": "2026-10-06",
  "condition_origin": "Chamgap's own application conditions",
  "method_sources": [
    {
      "id": "M03",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03",
      "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13",
      "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M04",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04",
      "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M08",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08",
      "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a",
      "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M15",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15",
      "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M19",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19",
      "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4",
      "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    }
  ],
  "status_dictionary": {
    "Met": "Status for necessary evidence confirmed after existing content review. No completion is declared in the current presentation.",
    "Partly verified": "Some information in the stored summary is linked into the table. External comparison/content review is not complete.",
    "Unverified": "The article leaves this unverified, or required material is absent from the current stored summary. This is distinct from zero, absence or safety.",
    "Review incomplete": "Existing content review remains incomplete.",
    "Not reported": "Not reported within the stored material actually read; not extended to the entire primary paper.",
    "Inaccessible": "Means an actual access failure. Access not attempted here is not assigned this state.",
    "Not applicable": "Not used as a substitute for an evidence gap.",
    "Conflicting data": "Requires an observed disagreement under the same comparison criteria; not automatically judged in this production.",
    "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Marks a gap in additional material required by the selected conditions; not a new efficacy grade."
  },
  "requirements": [
    {
      "item_id": "N01",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What is the selected serious-injury-only question and original grade?",
      "needed": "Separate subclaim D and note, combined-outcome B and parent B76",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Separate subclaim D and note, combined-outcome B and parent B76 to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Separate subclaim D and note, combined-outcome B and parent B76 must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.4 question-clarification principles; detailed separation rules are internally designed; M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limits of this material conversion follow the review scope and internal design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate the question, assessment record and assessments of other endpoints. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N02",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Who was studied for the serious-injury outcome and how were participants selected?",
      "needed": "Impaired balance or gait, community-dwelling women aged 75–85 and baseline risk",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Impaired balance or gait, community-dwelling women aged 75–85 and baseline risk to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Impaired balance or gait, community-dwelling women aged 75–85 and baseline risk must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.1; detailed population conditions are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Retain differences between the selected population and other high-risk groups. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N03",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What was the historical two-year program and actual exposure?",
      "needed": "Supervised group plus home exercise, weekly sessions, adherence and discontinuation",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Supervised group plus home exercise, weekly sessions, adherence and discontinuation to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Supervised group plus home exercise, weekly sessions, adherence and discontinuation must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; Reverse-direction labels and assessment adaptation are Chamgap design; M03 §3.2.3 and M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish planned intervention from actual exposure. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N04",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What were the control, concomitant measures and changes?",
      "needed": "Control care, shared or other exercise, medication, environment and rescue treatment",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Control care, shared or other exercise, medication, environment and rescue treatment to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Control care, shared or other exercise, medication, environment and rescue treatment must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; Reverse-direction labels and assessment adaptation are Chamgap design; M03 §3.2.3 and M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate the program contribution from other exposures. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N05",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are allocation and baseline balance in the 20-center RCT known?",
      "needed": "Allocation unit, sequence and concealment, centers and individuals, baseline characteristics",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Allocation unit, sequence and concealment, centers and individuals, baseline characteristics to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Allocation unit, sequence and concealment, centers and individuals, baseline characteristics must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 §8.1–8.2.3; own application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptation is our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate centers, participants and the actual randomized design. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N06",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Which criteria classified serious injury events?",
      "needed": "Serious-injury definition, physical harm and healthcare use, adjudication and reclassification",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Serious-injury definition, physical harm and healthcare use, adjudication and reclassification to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Serious-injury definition, physical harm and healthcare use, adjudication and reclassification must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are our own design; M08 Table 8.2.a, M03 §3.2.4; our own application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate definitions of serious-only injuries, combined injuries and all falls. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N07",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What is known about event collection, blinded adjudication, detection and omissions?",
      "needed": "Reporting and verification, blinding, collection frequency and omissions over time",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Reporting and verification, blinding, collection frequency and omissions over time to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Reporting and verification, blinding, collection frequency and omissions over time must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M03 §3.2.4; Chamgap application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate event occurrence, reporting and adjudication stages. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N08",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are 68/87 events counts of unique people?",
      "needed": "Serious events, people, repetition, denominators and duration",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Serious events, people, repetition, denominators and duration to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Serious events, people, repetition, denominators and duration must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are Chamgap's own design; M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish repeated events in the same person from event counts. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N09",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What result do the serious-only HR.83, interval and nonsignificance describe?",
      "needed": "Original estimate, CI, model, time and interpretation",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Original estimate, CI, model, time and interpretation to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Original estimate, CI, model, time and interpretation must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application; M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; Chamgap application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Link the original interval to the analysis of its endpoint. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N10",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Does a CI including 1 establish an exactly zero effect or equivalence?",
      "needed": "Original uncertainty, effects compatible with the interval, important differences and hypotheses",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Original uncertainty, effects compatible with the interval, important differences and hypotheses to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Original uncertainty, effects compatible with the interval, important differences and hypotheses must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; Chamgap application; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; separation of statuses is Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate nonsignificance and uncertainty from a distinct equivalence question. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N11",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Can the positive combined-injury finding be applied to serious injuries only?",
      "needed": "Moderate-plus-serious injuries, event counts, rates and HR, distinct endpoints",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Moderate-plus-serious injuries, event counts, rates and HR, distinct endpoints to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Moderate-plus-serious injuries, event counts, rates and HR, distinct endpoints must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; separation of statuses is Chamgap's own design; M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are Chamgap's own design; M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Preserve positive and nonsignificant results from the same trial together. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N12",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What history do the original primary outcome and recruitment-stage amendment provide for the serious-injury hierarchy?",
      "needed": "Original and amended primary outcome, timing, sample target and reasons",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Original and amended primary outcome, timing, sample target and reasons to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Original and amended primary outcome, timing, sample target and reasons must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application; M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are Chamgap's own design; M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limits to this material conversion reflect the review scope and Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the original hierarchy, amendment and current serious-injury result. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N13",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Were data-driven amendment, prespecification and multiplicity verified?",
      "needed": "Amendment decisions, data access, hypotheses, multiple comparisons and prior hierarchy",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Amendment decisions, data access, hypotheses, multiple comparisons and prior hierarchy to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Amendment decisions, data access, hypotheses, multiple comparisons and prior hierarchy must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; separation of statuses is Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate the original amendment narrative from actual verification. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N14",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What are the two-year follow-up, event times, censoring, missing data and denominators?",
      "needed": "Allocation, observation and analysis, actual time, attrition and deaths",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Allocation, observation and analysis, actual time, attrition and deaths to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Allocation, observation and analysis, actual time, attrition and deaths must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3 and M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Design-specific adaptation is Chamgap design; M08 §8.2.2 and M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish nominal duration from actual serious-injury observation and analysis. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N15",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What are the effect of interest, ITT, adherence and repeated-event handling for serious-injury analysis?",
      "needed": "Assignment effect, ITT/PP, models, deviations and sensitivity analyses",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Assignment effect, ITT/PP, models, deviations and sensitivity analyses to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Assignment effect, ITT/PP, models, deviations and sensitivity analyses must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M03 §3.2.3, M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; our own application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate endpoint-specific models, denominators and effect definitions. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N16",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Do other fall or functional outcomes answer the serious-injury-only question?",
      "needed": "All falls, fractures and hospitalization, function, mortality and primary or secondary hierarchy",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates All falls, fractures and hospitalization, function, mortality and primary or secondary hierarchy to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for All falls, fractures and hospitalization, function, mortality and primary or secondary hierarchy must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are Chamgap's own design; M03 §3.2.4; Chamgap extension boundaries; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish serious events from other clinical and functional questions. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N17",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What is the actual access status of registration, plans and amendments?",
      "needed": "NCT00545350, original and amended protocols, SAP and history",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates NCT00545350, original and amended protocols, SAP and history to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for NCT00545350, original and amended protocols, SAP and history must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application; M04 §4.5–4.6 principles for collecting and selecting materials; separation of access and reading and hyperlink rules are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "If materials are supplied, distinguish testing and hierarchy amendments from current results. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N18",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What is the scope of public support, non-involvement and detailed COI?",
      "needed": "AP-HP, Ministry of Health, ANR, INPES, Ile-de-France, roles and disclosures",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates AP-HP, Ministry of Health, ANR, INPES, Ile-de-France, roles and disclosures to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for AP-HP, Ministry of Health, ANR, INPES, Ile-de-France, roles and disclosures must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "Chamgap's own conditions for independence and attribution. The official methodological sections used in this example do not validate every detail of these items.",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate declared support from the scope of actual relationship verification. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N19",
      "question_type": "Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy table",
      "question": "Are the five exercise-related injurious falls the same as the serious-only outcome?",
      "needed": "Harm events, severity and time, exposure, people and event counts",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Harm events, severity and time, exposure, people and event counts to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Supplements gaps in safety materials for the selected subclaim. Fall-prevention effects, injury counts or the parent safety wording do not establish safety, and no new harm rate, exercise program, movement instruction or prescription is created.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Harm events, severity and time, exposure, people and event counts must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap application; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; detailed distinctions are Chamgap's own design; M19 §19.2 design-specific harm questions; timing details are Chamgap's own design; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap application; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate the prevention endpoint from program-related harm records. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N20",
      "question_type": "Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy table",
      "question": "Are harm relatedness, alternative explanations and long-term safety known?",
      "needed": "Original relatedness, baseline and concomitant factors, comparisons, rare events and vulnerable groups",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Original relatedness, baseline and concomitant factors, comparisons, rare events and vulnerable groups to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Supplements gaps in safety materials for the selected subclaim. Fall-prevention effects, injury counts or the parent safety wording do not establish safety, and no new harm rate, exercise program, movement instruction or prescription is created.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Original relatedness, baseline and concomitant factors, comparisons, rare events and vulnerable groups must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap application; M19 §19.2.2–19.2.4, M03 §3.2.3; Chamgap application; M19 §19.2.2–19.2.4 design considerations; detailed confounding records are Chamgap's own design; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap application; Chamgap interpretive boundaries draw on M19 principles, without executing an official causality tool",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate efficacy-related serious events from overall safety gaps. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N21",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Do related tai ji quan and Otago assessments directly establish the serious-only effect?",
      "needed": "Other programs, populations and durations, assessment links and bibliography",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Other programs, populations and durations, assessment links and bibliography to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Other programs, populations and durations, assessment links and bibliography must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 distinction between studies and reports; cohort and outcome linkage is Chamgap's own application; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application; M04 §4.5–4.6 principles for collecting and selecting materials; separation of access and reading and hyperlink rules are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate other exercise assessments from the current selected outcome. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N22",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "How are the same people, event severities and related sheets shared?",
      "needed": "Ossébo report and registration, combined versus serious-only outcomes, repeated events and time",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Ossébo report and registration, combined versus serious-only outcomes, repeated events and time to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Ossébo report and registration, combined versus serious-only outcomes, repeated events and time must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "Study/report distinction in M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2; Cohort/outcome linkage is Chamgap application; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 and M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish report slots from unique trials, participants and replication. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N23",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are findings extended to other populations, programs or durations?",
      "needed": "High-risk women aged 75–85, combined exposure, two years and direct extension evidence",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates High-risk women aged 75–85, combined exposure, two years and direct extension evidence to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for High-risk women aged 75–85, combined exposure, two years and direct extension evidence must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; dose, persistence and effect-modification details are Chamgap's own design; M03 §3.2.4; Chamgap extension boundaries",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate the scope of the selected serious-injury question from extension questions. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N24",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What history is retained in parent B76, languages, dates, empty values and corrections?",
      "needed": "Selected D, original axes with true, false and unrecorded values, Korean and English texts and historical cross-checks",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Selected D, original axes with true, false and unrecorded values, Korean and English texts and historical cross-checks to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Selected D, original axes with true, false and unrecorded values, Korean and English texts and historical cross-checks must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; current material-conversion limits reflect review scope and our own design; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; status distinctions are our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the original record from production and amendment events. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N25",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What is the reading status of the summary, external paper, registration, plans and disclosures?",
      "needed": "One original evidence entry, one citation, BMJ link, acquisition and actual reading",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates One original evidence entry, one citation, BMJ link, acquisition and actual reading to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for One original evidence entry, one citation, BMJ link, acquisition and actual reading must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.5–4.6 material collection/selection principles; acquisition/reading separation and hyperlink specifications are internally designed; M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limits of this material conversion follow the review scope and internal design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish material-specific existence, acquisition, reading level and access. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    }
  ]
}