{
  "schema_version": "chamgap-public-criteria-1.0",
  "title": "Two-year balance training × reduced moderate-plus-serious injurious falls in women aged 75–85 with impaired balance: an evidence checklist",
  "language": "en",
  "translation_date": "2026-10-11",
  "criteria_version": "1.0",
  "criteria_date": "2026-10-06",
  "condition_origin": "Chamgap's own application conditions",
  "method_sources": [
    {
      "id": "M03",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03",
      "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13",
      "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M04",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04",
      "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M08",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08",
      "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a",
      "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M15",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15",
      "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    },
    {
      "id": "M19",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19",
      "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4",
      "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.",
      "review_level": "Preserved method HTML copies; no current method-content re-review or official tool execution"
    }
  ],
  "status_dictionary": {
    "Met": "Status for necessary evidence confirmed after existing content review. No completion is declared in the current presentation.",
    "Partly verified": "Some information in the stored summary is linked into the table. External comparison/content review is not complete.",
    "Unverified": "The article leaves this unverified, or required material is absent from the current stored summary. This is distinct from zero, absence or safety.",
    "Review incomplete": "Existing content review remains incomplete.",
    "Not reported": "Not reported within the stored material actually read; not extended to the entire primary paper.",
    "Inaccessible": "Means an actual access failure. Access not attempted here is not assigned this state.",
    "Not applicable": "Not used as a substitute for an evidence gap.",
    "Conflicting data": "Requires an observed disagreement under the same comparison criteria; not automatically judged in this production.",
    "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Marks a gap in additional material required by the selected conditions; not a new efficacy grade."
  },
  "requirements": [
    {
      "item_id": "N01",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Which injurious-fall question and original assessment are preserved?",
      "needed": "Separate the selected grade B and note, parent B76 and serious-only grade D",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Separate the selected grade B and note, parent B76 and serious-only grade D to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Separate the selected grade B and note, parent B76 and serious-only grade D must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.4 question-clarification principles; detailed separation rules are internally designed; M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limits of this material conversion follow the review scope and internal design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Update the question, assessment record and assessment context separately. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N02",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Who was studied and how were community participants recruited?",
      "needed": "Women aged 75–85, impaired balance or gait, recruitment, exclusions and baseline risk",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Women aged 75–85, impaired balance or gait, recruitment, exclusions and baseline risk to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Women aged 75–85, impaired balance or gait, recruitment, exclusions and baseline risk must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.1; detailed population conditions are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Retain the differences between the studied population and other groups. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N03",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What was the two-year intervention and actual exposure?",
      "needed": "Supervised group sessions, home exercise, duration, actual adherence and changes",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Supervised group sessions, home exercise, duration, actual adherence and changes to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Supervised group sessions, home exercise, duration, actual adherence and changes must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; Reverse-direction labels and assessment adaptation are Chamgap design; M03 §3.2.3 and M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the planned program from actual exposure. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N04",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What were the control, shared and concomitant measures?",
      "needed": "Control services, other exercise or treatment, environmental changes and rescue measures",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Control services, other exercise or treatment, environmental changes and rescue measures to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Control services, other exercise or treatment, environmental changes and rescue measures must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.2–3.2.3; Reverse-direction labels and assessment adaptation are Chamgap design; M03 §3.2.3 and M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the program contribution from accompanying differences. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N05",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What was the 20-center randomized design and allocation?",
      "needed": "Centers, allocation unit and method, concealment and baseline balance",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Centers, allocation unit and method, concealment and baseline balance to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Centers, allocation unit and method, concealment and baseline balance must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 §8.1–8.2.3; own application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptation is our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Record the roles of centers and people within the source scope. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N06",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "How were moderate-plus-serious injurious events defined?",
      "needed": "Physical harm, healthcare use, moderate and serious criteria and overlap",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Physical harm, healthcare use, moderate and serious criteria and overlap to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Physical harm, healthcare use, moderate and serious criteria and overlap must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are our own design; M08 Table 8.2.a, M03 §3.2.4; our own application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Define combined injuries, serious-only injuries and all falls separately. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N07",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What is known about fall collection, blinded adjudication and omissions?",
      "needed": "Event reporting, confirmation, blinding, detection and follow-up methods",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Event reporting, confirmation, blinding, detection and follow-up methods to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Event reporting, confirmation, blinding, detection and follow-up methods must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M03 §3.2.4; Chamgap application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate actual verification at the reporting and adjudication stages. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N08",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are 305/397 counts of people or fall events?",
      "needed": "Separate events, people, repeated events and group-specific denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Separate events, people, repeated events and group-specific denominators to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Separate events, people, repeated events and group-specific denominators must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are Chamgap's own design; M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Link randomized people, fall events and repetition separately. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N09",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What are the woman-year rates and follow-up duration?",
      "needed": "Original rates, woman-years, actual observation time and censoring",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Original rates, woman-years, actual observation time and censoring to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Original rates, woman-years, actual observation time and censoring must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3 and M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Design-specific adaptation is Chamgap design; M08 §8.2.2 and M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish nominal two-year follow-up from actual person-time. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N10",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Which model produced the shared-frailty HR, interval and P value?",
      "needed": "Center adjustment, repeated-event and time handling, original HR, CI and P value",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Center adjustment, repeated-event and time handling, original HR, CI and P value to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Center adjustment, repeated-event and time handling, original HR, CI and P value must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application; M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; Chamgap application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3, M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; design-specific adaptations are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Retain event counts, rates, HR and analysis definitions separately. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N11",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What are the observed interval and criteria for an important difference?",
      "needed": "Original interval, effect magnitude, importance and prior assumptions",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Original interval, effect magnitude, importance and prior assumptions to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Original interval, effect magnitude, importance and prior assumptions must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; internal application; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; internal application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate sources for the interval and prior criteria. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N12",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What was the primary-outcome amendment during recruitment?",
      "needed": "Definitions before and after amendment, timing, sample target and reasons",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Definitions before and after amendment, timing, sample target and reasons to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Definitions before and after amendment, timing, sample target and reasons must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application; M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limits to this material conversion reflect the review scope and Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the amendment event from the hierarchy of actual results. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N13",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "How are data-driven amendment and limits to prespecification preserved?",
      "needed": "Amendment reasons, decision makers and timing, data access and analysis plans",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Amendment reasons, decision makers and timing, data access and analysis plans to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Amendment reasons, decision makers and timing, data access and analysis plans must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; separation of statuses is Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate reported amendment reasons from what was actually verified. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N14",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What are the randomized, completed and endpoint-specific analysis denominators and missing data?",
      "needed": "706/352/354, observation, analysis, attrition and handling",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates 706/352/354, observation, analysis, attrition and handling to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for 706/352/354, observation, analysis, attrition and handling must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M15 §15.3 and M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Design-specific adaptation is Chamgap design; M08 §8.2.2 and M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish allocation from actual observation and analysis. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N15",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What is known about ITT, adherence effects and supplementary or sensitivity analyses?",
      "needed": "Effect of interest, ITT/PP, actual exposure, changes and sensitivity analyses",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Effect of interest, ITT/PP, actual exposure, changes and sensitivity analyses to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Effect of interest, ITT/PP, actual exposure, changes and sensitivity analyses must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 §8.2.2, M15 §15.3.1; our own application; M03 §3.2.3, M08 §8.2.2–8.2.3; our own application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Record the difference between assignment to the program and actual participation effects. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N16",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Is the serious-injury-only result preserved alongside the combined result?",
      "needed": "Combined versus serious-only injuries, events, original HR and CI and hierarchy",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Combined versus serious-only injuries, events, original HR and CI and hierarchy to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Combined versus serious-only injuries, events, original HR and CI and hierarchy must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; separation of statuses is Chamgap's own design; M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are Chamgap's own design; M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Display other severity outcomes from the same trial together. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N17",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Do all falls and other secondary functional outcomes directly answer this question?",
      "needed": "Injuries versus all falls, fractures and function, endpoint definitions and denominators",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Injuries versus all falls, fractures and function, endpoint definitions and denominators to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Injuries versus all falls, fractures and function, endpoint definitions and denominators must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.4, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; question-specific outcome adaptations are Chamgap's own design; M03 §3.2.4; Chamgap extension boundaries; M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate fewer injuries from other events and functional outcomes. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N18",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Were registration and the original and amended plans actually read?",
      "needed": "NCT00545350, protocols, SAP and amendment history",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates NCT00545350, protocols, SAP and amendment history to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for NCT00545350, protocols, SAP and amendment history must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M08 Table 8.2.a, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application; M04 §4.5–4.6 principles for collecting and selecting materials; separation of access and reading and hyperlink rules are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "If materials are supplied, distinguish amendments to definitions, timing and analyses. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N19",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What is the scope of public support and declared non-involvement?",
      "needed": "AP-HP, French Ministry of Health, ANR, INPES, Ile-de-France and roles",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates AP-HP, French Ministry of Health, ANR, INPES, Ile-de-France and roles to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for AP-HP, French Ministry of Health, ANR, INPES, Ile-de-France and roles must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "Chamgap's own conditions for independence and attribution. The official methodological sections used in this example do not validate every detail of these items.",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate funders, declared and actual roles and the scope of verification. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N20",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are product support, employee authors, COI and analysis or writing support known?",
      "needed": "Product and equipment provision, employment, patents, disclosures and external services",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Product and equipment provision, employment, patents, disclosures and external services to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Product and equipment provision, employment, patents, disclosures and external services must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "Chamgap's own conditions for independence and attribution. The official methodological sections used in this example do not validate every detail of these items.",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Update each relationship separately from the support already recorded. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N21",
      "question_type": "Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy table",
      "question": "What do the five exercise-related injurious falls record?",
      "needed": "Event definition, people versus events, exposure, duration, severity and collection",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Event definition, people versus events, exposure, duration, severity and collection to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Supplements gaps in safety materials for the selected subclaim. Fall-prevention effects, injury counts or the parent safety wording do not establish safety, and no new harm rate, exercise program, movement instruction or prescription is created.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Event definition, people versus events, exposure, duration, severity and collection must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap application; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; detailed distinctions are Chamgap's own design; M19 §19.2 design-specific harm questions; timing details are Chamgap's own design; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap application; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4, M04 §4.6.3; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish prevention-related injury endpoints from program-related harms. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N22",
      "question_type": "Harm-information gaps supplementing the efficacy table",
      "question": "What can be said about relatedness and overall safety?",
      "needed": "Relatedness, other causes, comparative harms and long-term or vulnerable groups",
      "role": "Supplementary",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Relatedness, other causes, comparative harms and long-term or vulnerable groups to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Supplements gaps in safety materials for the selected subclaim. Fall-prevention effects, injury counts or the parent safety wording do not establish safety, and no new harm rate, exercise program, movement instruction or prescription is created.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Relatedness, other causes, comparative harms and long-term or vulnerable groups must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap application; M19 §19.2.2–19.2.4, M03 §3.2.3; Chamgap application; M19 §19.2.2–19.2.4 design considerations; detailed confounding records are Chamgap's own design; M19 §19.1.2–19.2.4; Chamgap application; Chamgap interpretive boundaries draw on M19 principles, without executing an official causality tool",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate original events from gaps in causality and safety scope. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N23",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are links to other exercise assessments new independent replication?",
      "needed": "Tai ji quan 1812, Otago 1834 and relationships between assessments, populations and programs",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Tai ji quan 1812, Otago 1834 and relationships between assessments, populations and programs to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Tai ji quan 1812, Otago 1834 and relationships between assessments, populations and programs must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 distinction between studies and reports; cohort and outcome linkage is Chamgap's own application; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2, M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application; M04 §4.5–4.6 principles for collecting and selecting materials; separation of access and reading and hyperlink rules are Chamgap's own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate comparison links from the evidence status of the current trial. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N24",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "How are the same people, severities, events and times shared?",
      "needed": "Report, Ossébo trial, injury categories, repeated events and other sheets from the same trial",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates Report, Ossébo trial, injury categories, repeated events and other sheets from the same trial to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for Report, Ossébo trial, injury categories, repeated events and other sheets from the same trial must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "Study/report distinction in M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2; Cohort/outcome linkage is Chamgap application; M04 §4.6.1–4.6.2 and M15 §15.3.1; Chamgap application",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish unrecorded unique clinical totals from report and material slots. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N25",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "Are findings extended to other populations, exercises, durations or outcomes?",
      "needed": "High-risk women, the specific combined program, two years and direct extension evidence",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates High-risk women, the specific combined program, two years and direct extension evidence to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for High-risk women, the specific combined program, two years and direct extension evidence must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M03 §3.2.1–3.2.4; dose, persistence and effect-modification details are Chamgap's own design; M03 §3.2.4; Chamgap extension boundaries",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Separate the narrow selected effect from extension questions. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N26",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What history is preserved in parent values, Korean and English wording, dates and empty correction records?",
      "needed": "B76, original axes with true, false, unrecorded and empty values, and language-specific amendment wording",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates B76, original axes with true, false, unrecorded and empty values, and language-specific amendment wording to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for B76, original axes with true, false, unrecorded and empty values, and language-specific amendment wording must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; current material-conversion limits reflect review scope and our own design; M04 §4.6.3, M15 §15.3.1–15.3.3; status distinctions are our own design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish the original record from production and amendment events. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N27",
      "question_type": "Efficacy comparison and presentation of stored material",
      "question": "What summary and external materials were actually read?",
      "needed": "One evidence entry, one citation, original URL and reading status of the paper, registration, plans and disclosures",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "This item separates One evidence entry, one citation, original URL and reading status of the paper, registration, plans and disclosures to link materials needed for the selected question with the materials currently available.",
      "application_exception": "Limited to the stored summary for the selected formulation, population, endpoint and period. It does not substitute for numbers from other formulations/trials/endpoints or unread external material.",
      "criterion": "Original materials and analysis scope for One evidence entry, one citation, original URL and reading status of the paper, registration, plans and disclosures must be available so that unverified matters can be distinguished. This record links preserved wording; the original content review remains incomplete.",
      "basis": "M04 §4.5–4.6 material collection/selection principles; acquisition/reading separation and hyperlink specifications are internally designed; M04 §4.5, §4.6.3; limits of this material conversion follow the review scope and internal design",
      "condition_origin": "Production conditions for turning the preserved account into a table; existing content review remains incomplete, and this is not a record of running an official tool or completing content review",
      "proposed_research": "Distinguish existence, acquisition, reading level and access history. This is a proposal; no new investigation, calculation or trial was performed."
    }
  ]
}