{
  "schema_version": "chamgap-public-criteria-1.0",
  "title": "Upper-body yoga × improved grip strength in carpal tunnel syndrome",
  "language": "en",
  "translation_date": "2026-10-09",
  "criteria_version": "1.0",
  "criteria_date": "2026-10-06",
  "condition_origin": "Chamgap's own application conditions",
  "method_sources": [
    {
      "id": "M03",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-03",
      "section": "§3.1, §3.2.1–3.2.3, MECIR C5/C7/C13",
      "official_principle": "Clearly record the question, eligibility conditions and reasons for changes, and distinguish variations in interventions.",
      "review_level": "Methodological principles stated in existing pilot materials and condition templates were referenced. The methodological text was not reviewed again in this work."
    },
    {
      "id": "M04",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5.1 (2025), chapter updated 2025-03",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-04",
      "section": "§4.5, §4.6.1–4.6.3, MECIR C42",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish studies from reports and link them; do not omit a study solely because results are unreported.",
      "review_level": "Methodological principles stated in existing pilot materials and condition templates were referenced. The methodological text was not reviewed again in this work."
    },
    {
      "id": "M08",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-08",
      "section": "§8.1–8.2.3, Table 8.2.a",
      "official_principle": "Define the outcome and effect of interest, then examine randomization, deviations, missing data, measurement and selective reporting.",
      "review_level": "Methodological principles stated in existing pilot materials and condition templates were referenced. The methodological text was not reviewed again in this work."
    },
    {
      "id": "M15",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2023-08",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-15",
      "section": "§15.2.4, §15.3.1–15.3.3",
      "official_principle": "Distinguish effect estimates, intervals, importance and applicability. Sample size alone does not determine precision.",
      "review_level": "Methodological principles stated in existing pilot materials and condition templates were referenced. The methodological text was not reviewed again in this work."
    },
    {
      "id": "M19",
      "version": "Cochrane Handbook 6.5 (2024), chapter updated 2019-10",
      "url": "https://www.cochrane.org/authors/handbooks-and-manuals/handbook/current/chapter-19",
      "section": "§19.1.2, §19.2.1–19.2.4",
      "official_principle": "Harm questions may require different designs, populations and follow-up from efficacy questions. Case reports do not establish incidence rates.",
      "review_level": "Methodological principles stated in existing pilot materials and condition templates were referenced. The methodological text was not reviewed again in this work."
    }
  ],
  "status_dictionary": {
    "Met": "The original content has been reviewed as meeting the conditions. This status is not used in this preparation.",
    "Partly verified": "Some information in the stored summary was linked during preparation; clinical verification or review is not complete.",
    "Unverified": "Required direct values, definitions or materials have not been established within the current storage and reading scope. This does not mean zero effect, no papers or failed access.",
    "Review incomplete": "Awaiting user review, or actual review remains incomplete.",
    "Not reported": "Used only when original materials were actually read and the outcome was judged unreported. Not used for external materials unread in this work.",
    "Inaccessible": "Used only when an actual access attempt has a recorded failure. Not used for access that was not attempted in this work.",
    "Insufficient evidence for the conditions": "Indicates insufficient direct materials for the relevant scope or conditions; it is not a new grade.",
    "Not applicable": "Used when the reason it does not apply to the original question is stated.",
    "Conflicting data": "Retains the scope of conflicting statements in original materials; it is not an arbitrary reassessment."
  },
  "requirements": [
    {
      "item_id": "N01",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What are the selected subclaim and the question and record pointers?",
      "needed": "The selected source wording, question and record pointers, and parent and sibling context.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What are the selected subclaim and the question and record pointers? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "What are the selected subclaim and the question and record pointers? The selected source wording, question and record pointers, and parent and sibling context. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "If the original question or materials change, record the distinction between the existing scope and a separate question."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N02",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How are the subclaim's actual grade and note, and absent score, status and axes, retained?",
      "needed": "The selected subclaim's actual fields and the parent's separate actual values.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "How are the subclaim's actual grade and note, and absent score, status and axes, retained? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not fill absent subclaim score/status/axes fields with the parent's grade C, 50 points or axes.",
      "criterion": "How are the subclaim's actual grade and note, and absent score, status and axes, retained? The selected subclaim's actual fields and the parent's separate actual values. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "If the subclaim is corrected, retain the full original text before the change and a record of the correction event."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N03",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What are the parent assessment, axes, safety label, null, false and empty values?",
      "needed": "The parent assessment, axes, original evaluation, history and limits of applicability.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What are the parent assessment, axes, safety label, null, false and empty values? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not turn historical defect lists, avoidability judgments or numerical criteria into a new automated score.",
      "criterion": "What are the parent assessment, axes, safety label, null, false and empty values? The parent assessment, axes, original evaluation, history and limits of applicability. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "If separate correction materials arrive, distinguish the original values, reasons for changes and correction events."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N04",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How are KO/EN text, dates, corrections and empty values preserved?",
      "needed": "The actual versions of each language's original text, evidence date, corrections and history.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "How are KO/EN text, dates, corrections and empty values preserved? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "How are KO/EN text, dates, corrections and empty values preserved? The actual versions of each language's original text, evidence date, corrections and history. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Record a new correction as a separate event with the full original text before the change, version and reason."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N05",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What was actually read, and which external materials remain unread?",
      "needed": "Acquisition and reading scope for each material, and the locations of original results.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What was actually read, and which external materials remain unread? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Only the original URL is linked; link checks or certification of reading are not performed.",
      "criterion": "What was actually read, and which external materials remain unread? Acquisition and reading scope for each material, and the locations of original results. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "If additional materials are read directly in a separate step, record the actual extent, scope, version and time."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N06",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What are the identity, year and bibliographic details of the primary report?",
      "needed": "Original bibliographic details and materials linking the paper to the trial and population.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What are the identity, year and bibliographic details of the primary report? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "What are the identity, year and bibliographic details of the primary report? Original bibliographic details and materials linking the paper to the trial and population. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "First establish whether a new report concerns the same trial and population or a different trial."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N07",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How is the sharing of one report, population and outcomes across the two tables shown?",
      "needed": "Overlap information for reports, trials, people, wrists, groups, outcomes and time points.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "How is the sharing of one report, population and outcomes across the two tables shown? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "The number of material slots does not certify counts of unique clinical trials or independent participants.",
      "criterion": "How is the sharing of one report, population and outcomes across the two tables shown? Overlap information for reports, trials, people, wrists, groups, outcomes and time points. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "When follow-up or companion reports are added, distinguish a shared population from independent data."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N08",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What population and eligibility criteria were used for carpal tunnel syndrome?",
      "needed": "Original information on diagnosis, recruitment, inclusion, exclusion, severity and baseline function.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What population and eligibility criteria were used for carpal tunnel syndrome? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "What population and eligibility criteria were used for carpal tunnel syndrome? Original information on diagnosis, recruitment, inclusion, exclusion, severity and baseline function. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Application to other populations or severity levels requires direct comparative data for those populations."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N09",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How much is known about baseline risk, representativeness and everyday exposure?",
      "needed": "Original information on baseline characteristics, group distributions, recruitment and concurrent exposures.",
      "role": "Supplementary; required for general application",
      "role_reason": "How much is known about baseline risk, representativeness and everyday exposure? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "How much is known about baseline risk, representativeness and everyday exposure? Original information on baseline characteristics, group distributions, recruitment and concurrent exposures. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "General application should be distinguished using data showing differences in the actual population and setting."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N10",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What upper-body yoga program was used in the original study?",
      "needed": "Original information on the supervised program's identity, delivery, actual exposure, instructors and modifications.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What upper-body yoga program was used in the original study? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Retain only the original study exposure; do not provide instructions for exercise, yoga or self-care.",
      "criterion": "What upper-body yoga program was used in the original study? Original information on the supervised program's identity, delivery, actual exposure, instructors and modifications. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Differences between programs should be distinguished using direct comparative data."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N11",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What were the original comparison conditions for the wrist-splint active control?",
      "needed": "Original information on the splint control's delivery, exposure, attention, adherence and concurrent care.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What were the original comparison conditions for the wrist-splint active control? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not make recommendations on splint use, replacing exercise or choosing treatment.",
      "criterion": "What were the original comparison conditions for the wrist-splint active control? Original information on the splint control's delivery, exposure, attention, adherence and concurrent care. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Link other control conditions only after distinguishing whether they were actually used and for what purpose."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N12",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What are the details of actual program exposure, adherence, discontinuation and concurrent treatment?",
      "needed": "Group-specific records of actual exposure, adherence, modifications, concurrent treatment and discontinuation.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What are the details of actual program exposure, adherence, discontinuation and concurrent treatment? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "What are the details of actual program exposure, adherence, discontinuation and concurrent treatment? Group-specific records of actual exposure, adherence, modifications, concurrent treatment and discontinuation. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Direct data distinguishing the assigned program from actual adherence are needed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N13",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How much is known about the randomized single-blind design and allocation procedures?",
      "needed": "Original plans and reports on sequence generation, allocation concealment, implementation and baseline balance.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "How much is known about the randomized single-blind design and allocation procedures? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "How much is known about the randomized single-blind design and allocation procedures? Original plans and reports on sequence generation, allocation concealment, implementation and baseline balance. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "When allocation materials are added, distinguish what is known from what remains unverified."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N14",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Is assessor blinding the same as blinding of pain responses and awareness of the intervention?",
      "needed": "Original information on assessors, respondents, intervention awareness, tests, expectations and measurement procedures.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Is assessor blinding the same as blinding of pain responses and awareness of the intervention? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "Is assessor blinding the same as blinding of pain responses and awareness of the intervention? Original information on assessors, respondents, intervention awareness, tests, expectations and measurement procedures. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Measurement, response and blinding data are needed for each outcome."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N15",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What were the original denominators for randomization, analysis and exclusions or withdrawals?",
      "needed": "Group-specific flow diagrams, inclusion and exclusion information, outcome denominators and missing data.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What were the original denominators for randomization, analysis and exclusions or withdrawals? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not add people, wrists or repeated measurements as new participants.",
      "criterion": "What were the original denominators for randomization, analysis and exclusions or withdrawals? Group-specific flow diagrams, inclusion and exclusion information, outcome denominators and missing data. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Original materials explaining the actual analysis population for each outcome are needed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N16",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What are the gaps in completer analysis, missing data and sensitivity analyses?",
      "needed": "Definitions of completer and full analyses, group-specific missing data, reasons, handling and sensitivity analyses.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What are the gaps in completer analysis, missing data and sensitivity analyses? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not apply historical assessments of substantial attrition, sample size or duration as new criteria.",
      "criterion": "What are the gaps in completer analysis, missing data and sensitivity analyses? Definitions of completer and full analyses, group-specific missing data, reasons, handling and sensitivity analyses. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Direct analysis materials addressing the effect of missing data after allocation are needed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N17",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How are eight-week results distinguished from persistence after treatment ends?",
      "needed": "Direct information on the starting point, measurement schedule, follow-up, treatment changes and long-term tracking.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "How are eight-week results distinguished from persistence after treatment ends? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "How are eight-week results distinguished from persistence after treatment ends? Direct information on the starting point, measurement schedule, follow-up, treatment changes and long-term tracking. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Persistent outcomes require adequate follow-up and direct comparative data."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N18",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What are the outcome hierarchy and multiplicity for grip, pain, other symptoms and tests?",
      "needed": "Original protocols, plans, outcome hierarchy, multiplicity and analysis materials.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What are the outcome hierarchy and multiplicity for grip, pain, other symptoms and tests? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "What are the outcome hierarchy and multiplicity for grip, pain, other symptoms and tests? Original protocols, plans, outcome hierarchy, multiplicity and analysis materials. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Direct materials distinguishing prespecified plans from actual reporting for each outcome are needed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N19",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How does the historical registration statement differ from actual registration verification?",
      "needed": "Original public materials on contemporaneous plans, registration status and analysis documents.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "How does the historical registration statement differ from actual registration verification? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not label the string as a registration ID, inaccessible material or direct verification.",
      "criterion": "How does the historical registration statement differ from actual registration verification? Original public materials on contemporaneous plans, registration status and analysis documents. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "When planning materials are added, record the relationship between that version and the report."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N20",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What is the original scope of 'independent funding not established'?",
      "needed": "Original disclosures on sponsorship, funding and provision of products or facilities.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What is the original scope of 'independent funding not established'? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not carry the original I1 forward as current certification of funding or analytical independence.",
      "criterion": "What is the original scope of 'independent funding not established'? Original disclosures on sponsorship, funding and provision of products or facilities. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "When sponsorship disclosures are added, distinguish the original unverified status from the new-information event."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N21",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What interests and research roles did authors, instructors and institutions have?",
      "needed": "Public information on conflicts of interest, sponsorship, program provision, data access, analysis and publication roles.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What interests and research roles did authors, instructors and institutions have? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "What interests and research roles did authors, instructors and institutions have? Public information on conflicts of interest, sponsorship, program provision, data access, analysis and publication roles. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Independence should be distinguished using materials showing the actual parties, involvement and data sharing."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N22",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How much harm data were actually collected and reported for yoga and splints?",
      "needed": "Original safety-collection methods, events, group denominators, exposure, duration and discontinuation data.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "How much harm data were actually collected and reported for yoga and splints? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not convert missing safety figures into zero adverse events or absence of harm.",
      "criterion": "How much harm data were actually collected and reported for yoga and splints? Original safety-collection methods, events, group denominators, exposure, duration and discontinuation data. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Harms from exercise and control exposures require direct event-specific verification and comparative data."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N23",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What are the timing, changes, missing data and alternative explanations for harms?",
      "needed": "Baseline risk, actual exposure, changes, event timing, verification, missing data and reasons for discontinuation.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What are the timing, changes, missing data and alternative explanations for harms? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "What are the timing, changes, missing data and alternative explanations for harms? Baseline risk, actual exposure, changes, event timing, verification, missing data and reasons for discontinuation. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Interpretation of harms should be supplemented by data on actual exposure, verification, comparisons and alternative explanations."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N24",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What are the gaps in long-term harms, vulnerable populations and rare harms?",
      "needed": "Long-term follow-up and exposure, denominator and comparative data for vulnerable populations and rare events.",
      "role": "Supplementary; required for extending safety conclusions",
      "role_reason": "What are the gaps in long-term harms, vulnerable populations and rare harms? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "What are the gaps in long-term harms, vulnerable populations and rare harms? Long-term follow-up and exposure, denominator and comparative data for vulnerable populations and rare events. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Long-term and rare harms require separate direct data with adequate follow-up and collection."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N25",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Can harm and symptom outcomes from the same trial be counted as independent replication?",
      "needed": "Relationships between reports, trials, populations, outcomes and follow-up, and the identity of new materials.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Can harm and symptom outcomes from the same trial be counted as independent replication? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Retain the new-unit increment of 0 and final independent count of null.",
      "criterion": "Can harm and symptom outcomes from the same trial be counted as independent replication? Relationships between reports, trials, populations, outcomes and follow-up, and the identity of new materials. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "First distinguish whether new materials concern the same population or an independent one, then link them."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N26",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What are the unit, measurement target and direction of the grip-strength result?",
      "needed": "Grip-strength equipment, units, hand/person measurement, repetitions, standardization and denominators.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What are the unit, measurement target and direction of the grip-strength result? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not convert mmHg to new units or count left and right measurements as new participants.",
      "criterion": "What are the unit, measurement target and direction of the grip-strength result? Grip-strength equipment, units, hand/person measurement, repetitions, standardization and denominators. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Original materials showing the direct grip-strength measurement conditions are needed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N27",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What kind of values are the original numbers 162 and 187?",
      "needed": "Original group-specific baseline, eight-week, change, variance, denominator, comparison and interval data.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What kind of values are the original numbers 162 and 187? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "What kind of values are the original numbers 162 and 187? Original group-specific baseline, eight-week, change, variance, denominator, comparison and interval data. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Materials directly presenting original group results and the effect of interest are needed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N28",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Is within-group grip-strength change the same as a between-group effect versus splints?",
      "needed": "Original splint- and yoga-group analyses and definitions of between-/within-group effects, adjustment and denominators.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Is within-group grip-strength change the same as a between-group effect versus splints? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not calculate new increases, ratios, CI or P values.",
      "criterion": "Is within-group grip-strength change the same as a between-group effect versus splints? Original splint- and yoga-group analyses and definitions of between-/within-group effects, adjustment and denominators. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Comparative intervention effects should be answered using actual control values and between-group analysis materials."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N29",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Are important grip-strength changes, individual responses and daily function established?",
      "needed": "Direct information on important change, responders, patient function, distributions and long-term follow-up.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Are important grip-strength changes, individual responses and daily function established? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "Are important grip-strength changes, individual responses and daily function established? Direct information on important change, responders, patient function, distributions and long-term follow-up. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Actual patient function and persistence require data for the relevant outcome, duration and comparison."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N30",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What are the details of grip measurement, blinding, effort and wrist status?",
      "needed": "Original records of grip measurement, repetitions, assessors, standardization, blinding and status.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What are the details of grip measurement, blinding, effort and wrist status? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "What are the details of grip measurement, blinding, effort and wrist status? Original records of grip measurement, repetitions, assessors, standardization, blinding and status. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Direct materials addressing measurement consistency and the effect of interest are needed."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N31",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Are pain, Phalen findings and other null outcomes substituted for grip strength?",
      "needed": "Direct tables for each outcome's definition, time point, denominator, between-group estimate and hierarchy.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "Are pain, Phalen findings and other null outcomes substituted for grip strength? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "Are pain, Phalen findings and other null outcomes substituted for grip strength? Direct tables for each outcome's definition, time point, denominator, between-group estimate and hierarchy. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Other outcomes should each be answered using their own direct data."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N32",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What historical scope underlies the lack of confirmatory replication and the 28-year statement?",
      "needed": "New bibliographic, population, design, intervention and direct grip-strength result information for the same question.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "What historical scope underlies the lack of confirmatory replication and the 28-year statement? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not convert unverified replication into absence of all subsequent research or certification of new independent counts.",
      "criterion": "What historical scope underlies the lack of confirmatory replication and the 28-year statement? New bibliographic, population, design, intervention and direct grip-strength result information for the same question. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "When independent results are added, distinguish shared original reports or populations from actual independence."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N33",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "Can the findings be extended to general yoga, long-term treatment or other populations?",
      "needed": "Direct outcome data showing differences in programs, populations, controls and durations.",
      "role": "Supplementary; required for extending applicability",
      "role_reason": "Can the findings be extended to general yoga, long-term treatment or other populations? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Do not recommend exercise, products, self-care or treatment substitution.",
      "criterion": "Can the findings be extended to general yoga, long-term treatment or other populations? Direct outcome data showing differences in programs, populations, controls and durations. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Results under other conditions should be distinguished using the relevant question and actual exposure and comparison data."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N34",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "How are the original direction of the grip result and its uncertainty retained together?",
      "needed": "Original subclaim and parent text, direct grip analyses and uncertainty information.",
      "role": "Required",
      "role_reason": "How are the original direction of the grip result and its uncertainty retained together? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "Distinguish the original summary from unread external materials; do not create calculations, effects, CI or new assessments beyond the original text.",
      "criterion": "How are the original direction of the grip result and its uncertainty retained together? Original subclaim and parent text, direct grip analyses and uncertainty information. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "Data updates should distinguish the original assessment from observations and the current preparation status."
    },
    {
      "item_id": "N35",
      "question_type": "Evidence condition",
      "question": "What records are retained when grip-strength materials or corrections are updated?",
      "needed": "Original locations, versions, questions, conditions, reasons for observation changes and additional direct materials.",
      "role": "Required (update boundaries)",
      "role_reason": "What records are retained when grip-strength materials or corrections are updated? This is needed to distinguish the relevant outcome, population and effect of interest from other scopes.",
      "application_exception": "This preparation does not create calculations, new effects/CI, grades or treatment guidance.",
      "criterion": "What records are retained when grip-strength materials or corrections are updated? Original locations, versions, questions, conditions, reasons for observation changes and additional direct materials. Distinguish the original scope, extent of direct verification and what remains unverified.",
      "basis": "These are study-family conditions linked to stored original text, not an application of an official clinical assessment method.",
      "condition_origin": "Draft prepared for the current question; all reviews and checks are assigned to the user",
      "proposed_research": "If new original materials are separately added, link them to the relevant item while retaining the user's review scope."
    }
  ]
}